LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Towards more socially inclusive smart sustainable cities: A study of smart city districts in Greater Copenhagen region
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2016
- Author/s
- Ssekatawa, Daniel
- Department/s
- The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics
- In LUP since
- 2016-11-03
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 2544 | 62 | 0 |
United States of America ![]() |
239 (9%) |
Sweden ![]() |
186 (7%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ![]() |
180 (7%) |
France ![]() |
176 (7%) |
Germany ![]() |
162 (6%) |
India ![]() |
154 (6%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ![]() |
90 (4%) |
Italy ![]() |
61 (2%) |
China ![]() |
59 (2%) |
South Africa ![]() |
56 (2%) |
Indonesia ![]() |
54 (2%) |
Canada ![]() |
54 (2%) |
Iran ![]() |
44 (2%) |
Australia ![]() |
42 (2%) |
Turkiye ![]() |
41 (2%) |
Egypt ![]() |
36 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China) ![]() |
34 (1%) |
South Korea ![]() |
33 (1%) |
Denmark ![]() |
33 (1%) |
Malaysia ![]() |
32 (1%) |
Russian Federation ![]() |
29 (1%) |
Spain ![]() |
29 (1%) |
Ireland ![]() |
28 (1%) |
Nigeria ![]() |
27 (1%) |
Brazil ![]() |
27 (1%) |
Singapore ![]() |
26 (1%) |
Kenya ![]() |
25 (1%) |
Philippines ![]() |
23 (1%) |
Romania ![]() |
23 (1%) |
Uganda ![]() |
20 (1%) |
Belgium ![]() |
19 (1%) |
Norway ![]() |
19 (1%) |
Czechia ![]() |
18 (1%) |
Thailand ![]() |
18 (1%) |
Greece ![]() |
18 (1%) |
Finland ![]() |
18 (1%) |
Portugal ![]() |
18 (1%) |
Pakistan ![]() |
17 (1%) |
Unknown ![]() |
16 (1%) |
United Arab Emirates ![]() |
14 (1%) |
Switzerland ![]() |
14 (1%) |
Saudi Arabia ![]() |
13 (1%) |
New Zealand ![]() |
13 (1%) |
Bangladesh ![]() |
13 (1%) |
Iraq ![]() |
13 (1%) |
Japan ![]() |
12 (0%) |
Viet Nam ![]() |
11 (0%) |
Poland ![]() |
11 (0%) |
Ukraine ![]() |
10 (0%) |
Morocco ![]() |
10 (0%) |
Ethiopia ![]() |
9 (0%) |
Oman ![]() |
9 (0%) |
Jordan ![]() |
8 (0%) |
Nepal ![]() |
8 (0%) |
Austria ![]() |
8 (0%) |
Slovenia ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Namibia ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Tunisia ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Mexico ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Algeria ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Hungary ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Jamaica ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Ghana ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Bulgaria ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Israel ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Albania ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Croatia ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Cyprus ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Colombia ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Yemen ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Zambia ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Zimbabwe ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Malta ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Taiwan (China) ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Qatar ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Peru ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Libya ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Bahrain ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Malawi ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Cameroon ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Myanmar ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Chile ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Gambia ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Georgia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Azerbaijan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Mauritius ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Uzbekistan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Lebanon ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Honduras ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Serbia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Macedonia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Rwanda ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Latvia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Montenegro ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Belarus ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Cambodia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Macao ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Seychelles ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Afghanistan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Costa Rica ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Sierra Leone ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Lithuania ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Botswana ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Ecuador ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Puerto Rico ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Tajikistan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Congo ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Fiji ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Kazakhstan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Luxembourg ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Slovakia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Venezuela ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Angola ![]() |
1 (0%) |





















































































































