LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- The legal status of polygamy in England and Germany - a comparison - Domicile v. Nationality
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2017
- Author/s
- Rinaldo Iversen, Michelle
- Department/s
- Department of Law; Faculty of Law
- In LUP since
- 2017-06-29
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 4283 | 1221 | 162 |
United States of America  |
1324 (31%) |
Germany  |
319 (7%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
256 (6%) |
India  |
191 (4%) |
Sweden  |
180 (4%) |
China  |
125 (3%) |
Pakistan  |
83 (2%) |
France  |
75 (2%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
73 (2%) |
Brazil  |
71 (2%) |
Nigeria  |
70 (2%) |
Slovakia  |
60 (1%) |
Unknown  |
58 (1%) |
Czechia  |
56 (1%) |
South Africa  |
54 (1%) |
Poland  |
52 (1%) |
Canada  |
49 (1%) |
Italy  |
48 (1%) |
Indonesia  |
46 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
44 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
44 (1%) |
Latvia  |
39 (1%) |
Australia  |
39 (1%) |
Russian Federation  |
39 (1%) |
Ghana  |
38 (1%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
37 (1%) |
Israel  |
36 (1%) |
Singapore  |
30 (1%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
29 (1%) |
Egypt  |
28 (1%) |
Spain  |
28 (1%) |
Iran  |
27 (1%) |
Kenya  |
27 (1%) |
Malaysia  |
26 (1%) |
Philippines  |
24 (1%) |
Ukraine  |
24 (1%) |
Switzerland  |
23 (1%) |
Bangladesh  |
22 (1%) |
Viet Nam  |
22 (1%) |
Japan  |
20 (0%) |
Belgium  |
19 (0%) |
Botswana  |
19 (0%) |
Romania  |
18 (0%) |
Thailand  |
18 (0%) |
Mexico  |
16 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
16 (0%) |
South Korea  |
16 (0%) |
Serbia  |
14 (0%) |
Uzbekistan  |
14 (0%) |
Norway  |
13 (0%) |
Ethiopia  |
13 (0%) |
Ireland  |
11 (0%) |
Finland  |
9 (0%) |
Zambia  |
9 (0%) |
Portugal  |
8 (0%) |
Greece  |
8 (0%) |
Iraq  |
7 (0%) |
Hungary  |
7 (0%) |
Nepal  |
7 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
7 (0%) |
Albania  |
7 (0%) |
Georgia  |
7 (0%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
6 (0%) |
Morocco  |
6 (0%) |
Colombia  |
6 (0%) |
Sudan  |
6 (0%) |
Jordan  |
6 (0%) |
Argentina  |
6 (0%) |
Uganda  |
6 (0%) |
Zimbabwe  |
5 (0%) |
Austria  |
5 (0%) |
Oman  |
5 (0%) |
Lithuania  |
5 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
5 (0%) |
Afghanistan  |
5 (0%) |
Libya  |
5 (0%) |
Estonia  |
4 (0%) |
Malawi  |
4 (0%) |
Sierra Leone  |
4 (0%) |
Macedonia  |
4 (0%) |
Algeria  |
4 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
4 (0%) |
Peru  |
4 (0%) |
Luxembourg  |
4 (0%) |
Kuwait  |
3 (0%) |
Cameroon  |
3 (0%) |
Chile  |
3 (0%) |
Costa Rica  |
3 (0%) |
Guyana  |
3 (0%) |
Kazakhstan  |
3 (0%) |
Dominican Republic  |
2 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic  |
2 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
2 (0%) |
Denmark  |
2 (0%) |
Jamaica  |
2 (0%) |
Eritrea  |
2 (0%) |
Sri Lanka  |
2 (0%) |
Slovenia  |
2 (0%) |
Maldives  |
2 (0%) |
Mongolia  |
2 (0%) |
Iceland  |
2 (0%) |
Paraguay  |
2 (0%) |
Qatar  |
2 (0%) |
Bahrain  |
2 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago  |
1 (0%) |
Angola  |
1 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic  |
1 (0%) |
Malta  |
1 (0%) |
Belize  |
1 (0%) |
Isle of Man  |
1 (0%) |
Namibia  |
1 (0%) |
Cambodia  |
1 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire  |
1 (0%) |
Benin  |
1 (0%) |
Lesotho  |
1 (0%) |
Jersey  |
1 (0%) |
Senegal  |
1 (0%) |
Liberia  |
1 (0%) |
Seychelles  |
1 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of  |
1 (0%) |
Chad  |
1 (0%) |
South Sudan  |
1 (0%) |
Mozambique  |
1 (0%) |
Uruguay  |
1 (0%) |
Antigua and Barbuda  |
1 (0%) |
Venezuela  |
1 (0%) |
Azerbaijan  |
1 (0%) |
Mali  |
1 (0%) |
Myanmar  |
1 (0%) |
Puerto Rico  |
1 (0%) |
Barbados  |
1 (0%) |
Somalia  |
1 (0%) |
Mauritius  |
1 (0%) |