LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Incorporating Indigenous Knowledge in the Local Government’s Early Warning System: A Case Study from Baringo County, Kenya
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2017
- Author/s
- Liang, Shu
- Department/s
- Division of Risk Management and Societal Safety
- In LUP since
- 2017-08-29
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 1836 | 145 | 0 |
China ![]() |
252 (14%) |
Kenya ![]() |
236 (13%) |
United States of America ![]() |
204 (11%) |
Ethiopia ![]() |
172 (9%) |
South Africa ![]() |
131 (7%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ![]() |
68 (4%) |
Sweden ![]() |
66 (4%) |
Zimbabwe ![]() |
63 (3%) |
Philippines ![]() |
51 (3%) |
Germany ![]() |
48 (3%) |
India ![]() |
37 (2%) |
Unknown ![]() |
31 (2%) |
Indonesia ![]() |
31 (2%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ![]() |
29 (2%) |
Nigeria ![]() |
28 (2%) |
Uganda ![]() |
25 (1%) |
Canada ![]() |
25 (1%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of ![]() |
20 (1%) |
Australia ![]() |
20 (1%) |
France ![]() |
19 (1%) |
Malawi ![]() |
16 (1%) |
Russian Federation ![]() |
15 (1%) |
Brazil ![]() |
13 (1%) |
Taiwan (China) ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Spain ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Zambia ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Japan ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China) ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Pakistan ![]() |
8 (0%) |
Switzerland ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Singapore ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Bangladesh ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Czechia ![]() |
7 (0%) |
New Zealand ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Uruguay ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Namibia ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Thailand ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Viet Nam ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Eritrea ![]() |
5 (0%) |
South Korea ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Fiji ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Malaysia ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Finland ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Italy ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Ukraine ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Nepal ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Ghana ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Somalia ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Sudan ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Poland ![]() |
3 (0%) |
South Sudan ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Greece ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Lithuania ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Rwanda ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Sri Lanka ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Peru ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Mozambique ![]() |
2 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Mauritius ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Benin ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Denmark ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Latvia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Cameroon ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Belgium ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Malta ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Botswana ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Iran ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Argentina ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Djibouti ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Turkiye ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Vanuatu ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Colombia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Afghanistan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Norway ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Tunisia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Chile ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Cambodia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Mexico ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Ireland ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Paraguay ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Honduras ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Hungary ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Israel ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Dominican Republic ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Romania ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Portugal ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Qatar ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Eswatini ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Austria ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Lesotho ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Ecuador ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia ![]() |
1 (0%) |





























































































