LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Guanxi and Corruption Study on the Firm-Level in a Chinese context
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2017
- Author/s
- Dai, Jing
- Department/s
- Department of Economic History
- In LUP since
- 2017-09-07
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 2859 | 811 | 11 |
United States of America ![]() |
962 (34%) |
China ![]() |
202 (7%) |
Thailand ![]() |
125 (4%) |
Hong Kong (China) ![]() |
110 (4%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ![]() |
101 (4%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ![]() |
90 (3%) |
Germany ![]() |
88 (3%) |
Singapore ![]() |
80 (3%) |
Nigeria ![]() |
74 (3%) |
Sweden ![]() |
71 (2%) |
Unknown ![]() |
65 (2%) |
France ![]() |
58 (2%) |
Latvia ![]() |
47 (2%) |
Belgium ![]() |
44 (2%) |
Philippines ![]() |
43 (2%) |
Russian Federation ![]() |
42 (1%) |
Australia ![]() |
42 (1%) |
Canada ![]() |
38 (1%) |
Bulgaria ![]() |
37 (1%) |
Brazil ![]() |
36 (1%) |
Viet Nam ![]() |
34 (1%) |
Malaysia ![]() |
28 (1%) |
South Africa ![]() |
25 (1%) |
India ![]() |
24 (1%) |
Ukraine ![]() |
21 (1%) |
Ireland ![]() |
20 (1%) |
Japan ![]() |
20 (1%) |
Spain ![]() |
18 (1%) |
Iran ![]() |
18 (1%) |
Indonesia ![]() |
18 (1%) |
Ghana ![]() |
16 (1%) |
Italy ![]() |
15 (1%) |
South Korea ![]() |
15 (1%) |
Poland ![]() |
14 (0%) |
Austria ![]() |
13 (0%) |
Romania ![]() |
12 (0%) |
Taiwan (China) ![]() |
12 (0%) |
Bangladesh ![]() |
11 (0%) |
Argentina ![]() |
11 (0%) |
Turkiye ![]() |
10 (0%) |
Kenya ![]() |
9 (0%) |
Mexico ![]() |
9 (0%) |
Colombia ![]() |
9 (0%) |
Pakistan ![]() |
8 (0%) |
Finland ![]() |
8 (0%) |
Myanmar ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Cambodia ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Denmark ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Peru ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Ecuador ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Macao ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Portugal ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Iraq ![]() |
4 (0%) |
New Zealand ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Norway ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Ethiopia ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Greece ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Israel ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Hungary ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Lithuania ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Morocco ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Bahamas ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Uganda ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Benin ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Oman ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Uzbekistan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Switzerland ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Serbia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Senegal ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Mozambique ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Papua New Guinea ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Estonia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Tunisia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Jamaica ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Zambia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Slovakia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Algeria ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Costa Rica ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Angola ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Qatar ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Chile ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Bolivia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Slovenia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Czechia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Kazakhstan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Sri Lanka ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Solomon Islands ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Nepal ![]() |
1 (0%) |
































































































