LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- The hierarchy of Chinese grammar: A cross-sectional study of L2 Chinese within Processability Theory
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2017
- Author/s
- Brolin, Magnus
- Department/s
- Master's Programme: Language and Linguistics
- In LUP since
- 2017-11-17
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 2029 | 687 | 28 |
United States of America  |
591 (29%) |
Sweden  |
136 (7%) |
China  |
112 (6%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
72 (4%) |
Singapore  |
60 (3%) |
Brazil  |
52 (3%) |
Unknown  |
48 (2%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
47 (2%) |
Canada  |
45 (2%) |
Germany  |
38 (2%) |
Italy  |
37 (2%) |
Russian Federation  |
36 (2%) |
Viet Nam  |
36 (2%) |
India  |
35 (2%) |
Mexico  |
30 (1%) |
Japan  |
29 (1%) |
Indonesia  |
29 (1%) |
Thailand  |
29 (1%) |
Australia  |
29 (1%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
28 (1%) |
Malaysia  |
26 (1%) |
South Korea  |
25 (1%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
22 (1%) |
Sri Lanka  |
21 (1%) |
Spain  |
21 (1%) |
Egypt  |
18 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
17 (1%) |
France  |
16 (1%) |
South Africa  |
16 (1%) |
Poland  |
15 (1%) |
Cambodia  |
14 (1%) |
Nigeria  |
14 (1%) |
Ukraine  |
13 (1%) |
Pakistan  |
12 (1%) |
Ethiopia  |
11 (1%) |
Bangladesh  |
10 (0%) |
Iran  |
10 (0%) |
Philippines  |
10 (0%) |
Colombia  |
9 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
8 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
8 (0%) |
Morocco  |
8 (0%) |
Argentina  |
8 (0%) |
Denmark  |
6 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
6 (0%) |
Kenya  |
6 (0%) |
Finland  |
5 (0%) |
Peru  |
5 (0%) |
Kazakhstan  |
5 (0%) |
Belgium  |
5 (0%) |
Czechia  |
5 (0%) |
Nepal  |
5 (0%) |
Romania  |
5 (0%) |
Greece  |
5 (0%) |
Norway  |
4 (0%) |
Ecuador  |
4 (0%) |
Hungary  |
4 (0%) |
Luxembourg  |
3 (0%) |
Austria  |
3 (0%) |
Macao  |
3 (0%) |
Cyprus  |
3 (0%) |
Venezuela  |
3 (0%) |
Mongolia  |
3 (0%) |
Qatar  |
3 (0%) |
Latvia  |
3 (0%) |
Ireland  |
3 (0%) |
Kuwait  |
3 (0%) |
Botswana  |
3 (0%) |
Myanmar  |
3 (0%) |
Sudan  |
3 (0%) |
Israel  |
3 (0%) |
Zimbabwe  |
3 (0%) |
Chile  |
3 (0%) |
Turkmenistan  |
2 (0%) |
Madagascar  |
2 (0%) |
Angola  |
2 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
2 (0%) |
Slovenia  |
2 (0%) |
Uganda  |
2 (0%) |
Costa Rica  |
2 (0%) |
Uzbekistan  |
2 (0%) |
Yemen  |
2 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
2 (0%) |
Iraq  |
2 (0%) |
Jordan  |
2 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
2 (0%) |
Switzerland  |
2 (0%) |
Senegal  |
2 (0%) |
Lithuania  |
2 (0%) |
Uruguay  |
2 (0%) |
Algeria  |
2 (0%) |
Niger  |
1 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic  |
1 (0%) |
Jamaica  |
1 (0%) |
Portugal  |
1 (0%) |
El Salvador  |
1 (0%) |
Iceland  |
1 (0%) |
Georgia  |
1 (0%) |
Albania  |
1 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire  |
1 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
1 (0%) |
Rwanda  |
1 (0%) |
Dominica  |
1 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of  |
1 (0%) |
Suriname  |
1 (0%) |
Togo  |
1 (0%) |
Zambia  |
1 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago  |
1 (0%) |
Somalia  |
1 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
1 (0%) |
Panama  |
1 (0%) |
Sierra Leone  |
1 (0%) |
Belarus  |
1 (0%) |
Puerto Rico  |
1 (0%) |
Dominican Republic  |
1 (0%) |