LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- The hierarchy of Chinese grammar: A cross-sectional study of L2 Chinese within Processability Theory
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2017
- Author/s
- Brolin, Magnus
- Department/s
- Master's Programme: Language and Linguistics
- In LUP since
- 2017-11-17
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 1532 | 190 | 0 |
United States of America ![]() |
305 (20%) |
Sweden ![]() |
128 (8%) |
China ![]() |
101 (7%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ![]() |
54 (4%) |
Unknown ![]() |
48 (3%) |
Singapore ![]() |
47 (3%) |
Hong Kong (China) ![]() |
44 (3%) |
Russian Federation ![]() |
36 (2%) |
Italy ![]() |
36 (2%) |
Germany ![]() |
36 (2%) |
Canada ![]() |
29 (2%) |
Viet Nam ![]() |
29 (2%) |
Australia ![]() |
29 (2%) |
Taiwan (China) ![]() |
28 (2%) |
Thailand ![]() |
28 (2%) |
Indonesia ![]() |
27 (2%) |
Japan ![]() |
26 (2%) |
Brazil ![]() |
26 (2%) |
South Korea ![]() |
25 (2%) |
Malaysia ![]() |
24 (2%) |
India ![]() |
24 (2%) |
Sri Lanka ![]() |
21 (1%) |
France ![]() |
18 (1%) |
Egypt ![]() |
18 (1%) |
Spain ![]() |
16 (1%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ![]() |
16 (1%) |
Cambodia ![]() |
14 (1%) |
Nigeria ![]() |
14 (1%) |
Mexico ![]() |
14 (1%) |
Turkiye ![]() |
13 (1%) |
Ethiopia ![]() |
11 (1%) |
South Africa ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Iran ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Pakistan ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Ukraine ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Philippines ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina ![]() |
8 (1%) |
Romania ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Poland ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Colombia ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Denmark ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Peru ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Nepal ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Kenya ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Morocco ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Czechia ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Bangladesh ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Switzerland ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Belgium ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Norway ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Kazakhstan ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Finland ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Hungary ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Ireland ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Greece ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Argentina ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Botswana ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Chile ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Israel ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Austria ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Sudan ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Zimbabwe ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Myanmar ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Luxembourg ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Senegal ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Madagascar ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Lithuania ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Ecuador ![]() |
2 (0%) |
New Zealand ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Angola ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Slovakia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Macao ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Qatar ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Latvia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Uruguay ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Algeria ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Yemen ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Uzbekistan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Slovenia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Uganda ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Cyprus ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Turkmenistan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Portugal ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Niger ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Mongolia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Georgia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Somalia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Rwanda ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Costa Rica ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Venezuela ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Jordan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Seychelles ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Bulgaria ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Albania ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Togo ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Kuwait ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Sierra Leone ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Tunisia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Zambia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Iceland ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic ![]() |
1 (0%) |
El Salvador ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Suriname ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Belarus ![]() |
1 (0%) |













































































































