LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Gender and the City - a comparative analysis of how Malmö and Umeå approaches gender and intersectionality in urban planning
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2018
- Author/s
- Dahlskog, Tilda
- Department/s
- Department of Human Geography
- In LUP since
- 2018-01-23
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 1705 | 81 | 0 |
Sweden ![]() |
494 (29%) |
United States of America ![]() |
155 (9%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ![]() |
132 (8%) |
Germany ![]() |
120 (7%) |
India ![]() |
67 (4%) |
China ![]() |
57 (3%) |
Canada ![]() |
45 (3%) |
Italy ![]() |
45 (3%) |
France ![]() |
44 (3%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ![]() |
29 (2%) |
Turkiye ![]() |
28 (2%) |
South Africa ![]() |
27 (2%) |
Spain ![]() |
27 (2%) |
Australia ![]() |
25 (1%) |
Austria ![]() |
24 (1%) |
Norway ![]() |
24 (1%) |
South Korea ![]() |
21 (1%) |
Denmark ![]() |
18 (1%) |
Poland ![]() |
15 (1%) |
New Zealand ![]() |
15 (1%) |
Belgium ![]() |
15 (1%) |
Finland ![]() |
15 (1%) |
Unknown ![]() |
14 (1%) |
Iran ![]() |
13 (1%) |
Indonesia ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Thailand ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Brazil ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Egypt ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Portugal ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Ireland ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Singapore ![]() |
8 (0%) |
Albania ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Nigeria ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Bangladesh ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Kenya ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Mexico ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Russian Federation ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Pakistan ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Romania ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Iraq ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Serbia ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Zimbabwe ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Philippines ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Argentina ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Switzerland ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Chile ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Sri Lanka ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Viet Nam ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Czechia ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Hong Kong (China) ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Iceland ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Jordan ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Japan ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Malaysia ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Israel ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Georgia ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Morocco ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Taiwan (China) ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Ukraine ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Lithuania ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Lebanon ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Kazakhstan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Greece ![]() |
2 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Nepal ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Hungary ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Uganda ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Luxembourg ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Croatia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Colombia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Bulgaria ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Mongolia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Namibia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Peru ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Kuwait ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Uzbekistan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Zambia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Estonia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Ghana ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Algeria ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Malawi ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Oman ![]() |
1 (0%) |





















































































