LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Mapping Flows of Textile Waste in Sweden and an Analysis of Alternatives
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2018
- Author/s
- Grip, Lina
- Department/s
- Environmental and Energy Systems Studies; Environmental Engineering (M.Sc.Eng.)
- In LUP since
- 2018-06-18
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 7758 | 803 | 0 |
United States of America ![]() |
2270 (29%) |
Sweden ![]() |
720 (9%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ![]() |
384 (5%) |
Nigeria ![]() |
375 (5%) |
Thailand ![]() |
334 (4%) |
France ![]() |
301 (4%) |
Germany ![]() |
290 (4%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ![]() |
244 (3%) |
Unknown ![]() |
213 (3%) |
Bulgaria ![]() |
196 (3%) |
Canada ![]() |
178 (2%) |
Poland ![]() |
141 (2%) |
South Africa ![]() |
106 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China) ![]() |
99 (1%) |
Spain ![]() |
96 (1%) |
Viet Nam ![]() |
86 (1%) |
Latvia ![]() |
84 (1%) |
Lithuania ![]() |
83 (1%) |
Turkiye ![]() |
78 (1%) |
Italy ![]() |
76 (1%) |
Russian Federation ![]() |
71 (1%) |
China ![]() |
71 (1%) |
Portugal ![]() |
71 (1%) |
Romania ![]() |
63 (1%) |
Australia ![]() |
57 (1%) |
Cyprus ![]() |
54 (1%) |
Ukraine ![]() |
53 (1%) |
Cote d'Ivoire ![]() |
53 (1%) |
Indonesia ![]() |
49 (1%) |
Czechia ![]() |
47 (1%) |
India ![]() |
46 (1%) |
Malaysia ![]() |
44 (1%) |
Bangladesh ![]() |
43 (1%) |
Finland ![]() |
42 (1%) |
Philippines ![]() |
41 (1%) |
Singapore ![]() |
38 (0%) |
Norway ![]() |
36 (0%) |
Denmark ![]() |
35 (0%) |
Japan ![]() |
33 (0%) |
Iran ![]() |
29 (0%) |
Ghana ![]() |
27 (0%) |
Bolivia ![]() |
26 (0%) |
Estonia ![]() |
24 (0%) |
Taiwan (China) ![]() |
23 (0%) |
Morocco ![]() |
23 (0%) |
Croatia ![]() |
21 (0%) |
Greece ![]() |
21 (0%) |
Austria ![]() |
18 (0%) |
Belgium ![]() |
17 (0%) |
Kenya ![]() |
16 (0%) |
Slovakia ![]() |
14 (0%) |
South Korea ![]() |
13 (0%) |
Switzerland ![]() |
13 (0%) |
Myanmar ![]() |
12 (0%) |
Mexico ![]() |
9 (0%) |
Hungary ![]() |
8 (0%) |
Uganda ![]() |
8 (0%) |
Brazil ![]() |
8 (0%) |
New Zealand ![]() |
8 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates ![]() |
8 (0%) |
Cambodia ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Luxembourg ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Ireland ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Egypt ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Virgin Islands (U.S.) ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Pakistan ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Burkina Faso ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Colombia ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Ethiopia ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Iceland ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Israel ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Togo ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Belarus ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Iraq ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Senegal ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Oman ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Sri Lanka ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Costa Rica ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Slovenia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Kazakhstan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Serbia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Seychelles ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Qatar ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Armenia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Afghanistan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Benin ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Bahrain ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Nepal ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Jordan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Albania ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Yemen ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Ecuador ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Peru ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Panama ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Rwanda ![]() |
1 (0%) |



































































































