LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Impacts of increased plastic recycling in Sweden - A quantitative study of the environmental, social and economic impacts of increased plastic recycling in Sweden
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2018
- Author/s
- Esmailzadeh Davani, Aida
- Department/s
- Studies in Environmental Science
- In LUP since
- 2018-08-16
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 3788 | 206 | 0 |
Sweden ![]() |
1325 (35%) |
United States of America ![]() |
408 (11%) |
India ![]() |
203 (5%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ![]() |
138 (4%) |
Germany ![]() |
136 (4%) |
France ![]() |
80 (2%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ![]() |
77 (2%) |
Unknown ![]() |
66 (2%) |
Australia ![]() |
60 (2%) |
Denmark ![]() |
59 (2%) |
China ![]() |
57 (2%) |
Canada ![]() |
54 (1%) |
Malaysia ![]() |
50 (1%) |
Brazil ![]() |
49 (1%) |
Viet Nam ![]() |
48 (1%) |
Russian Federation ![]() |
46 (1%) |
Singapore ![]() |
44 (1%) |
Japan ![]() |
43 (1%) |
Nigeria ![]() |
40 (1%) |
Thailand ![]() |
39 (1%) |
Indonesia ![]() |
38 (1%) |
Finland ![]() |
34 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China) ![]() |
33 (1%) |
Spain ![]() |
32 (1%) |
Turkiye ![]() |
29 (1%) |
Italy ![]() |
28 (1%) |
Philippines ![]() |
26 (1%) |
Switzerland ![]() |
23 (1%) |
Poland ![]() |
22 (1%) |
Norway ![]() |
21 (1%) |
Ethiopia ![]() |
21 (1%) |
South Korea ![]() |
21 (1%) |
South Africa ![]() |
18 (0%) |
Belgium ![]() |
18 (0%) |
Mexico ![]() |
17 (0%) |
Taiwan (China) ![]() |
16 (0%) |
Latvia ![]() |
16 (0%) |
Czechia ![]() |
15 (0%) |
Kenya ![]() |
15 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina ![]() |
14 (0%) |
Ireland ![]() |
13 (0%) |
Austria ![]() |
12 (0%) |
Pakistan ![]() |
12 (0%) |
Bangladesh ![]() |
11 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates ![]() |
11 (0%) |
Costa Rica ![]() |
11 (0%) |
Ukraine ![]() |
11 (0%) |
New Zealand ![]() |
10 (0%) |
Portugal ![]() |
10 (0%) |
Lithuania ![]() |
9 (0%) |
Colombia ![]() |
9 (0%) |
Ghana ![]() |
9 (0%) |
Iraq ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Greece ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Israel ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Hungary ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Bulgaria ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Estonia ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Iceland ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Luxembourg ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Romania ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Nepal ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Zimbabwe ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Argentina ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Egypt ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Morocco ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Uganda ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Serbia ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Kazakhstan ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Iran ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Bolivia ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Cyprus ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Chile ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Sri Lanka ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Ecuador ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Slovakia ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Oman ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Kyrgyzstan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Peru ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Mongolia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Jordan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Cameroon ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Lebanon ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Paraguay ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Myanmar ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Panama ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Belize ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Macao ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Malta ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Tunisia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Qatar ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Uzbekistan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Uruguay ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Monaco ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Cambodia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Venezuela ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Botswana ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Slovenia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Croatia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Algeria ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Somalia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Zambia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Malawi ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Sierra Leone ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Belarus ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Libya ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Albania ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Georgia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Bahrain ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Yemen ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Puerto Rico ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Azerbaijan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Benin ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Togo ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Senegal ![]() |
1 (0%) |


























































































































