LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- English Premier League Clubs as Iconic Brands? A case study of three English Premier League football clubs from a cultural branding perspective
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2022
- Author/s
- Björkman, Agnes; Larsson, Emma
- Department/s
- Department of Strategic Communication
- In LUP since
- 2023-01-12
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 2056 | 1301 | 2 |
United States of America  |
686 (33%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
194 (9%) |
Brazil  |
188 (9%) |
China  |
68 (3%) |
Germany  |
52 (3%) |
Canada  |
46 (2%) |
Sweden  |
44 (2%) |
France  |
42 (2%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
40 (2%) |
Spain  |
37 (2%) |
Italy  |
29 (1%) |
India  |
25 (1%) |
Colombia  |
24 (1%) |
Viet Nam  |
24 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
23 (1%) |
Indonesia  |
23 (1%) |
Denmark  |
22 (1%) |
Singapore  |
21 (1%) |
Argentina  |
21 (1%) |
Poland  |
20 (1%) |
Japan  |
20 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
20 (1%) |
Algeria  |
16 (1%) |
Mexico  |
16 (1%) |
Portugal  |
15 (1%) |
Ireland  |
13 (1%) |
Ukraine  |
13 (1%) |
South Africa  |
13 (1%) |
Ecuador  |
13 (1%) |
Chile  |
13 (1%) |
Australia  |
13 (1%) |
Unknown  |
12 (1%) |
Nigeria  |
9 (0%) |
Thailand  |
8 (0%) |
Pakistan  |
8 (0%) |
Iran  |
8 (0%) |
Egypt  |
8 (0%) |
Romania  |
8 (0%) |
Morocco  |
7 (0%) |
South Korea  |
7 (0%) |
Russian Federation  |
7 (0%) |
Peru  |
7 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
6 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
6 (0%) |
Israel  |
6 (0%) |
Kenya  |
6 (0%) |
Slovenia  |
5 (0%) |
Malaysia  |
5 (0%) |
Austria  |
5 (0%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
4 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
4 (0%) |
Finland  |
4 (0%) |
Nepal  |
4 (0%) |
Hungary  |
4 (0%) |
Ethiopia  |
4 (0%) |
Iraq  |
4 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
3 (0%) |
Luxembourg  |
3 (0%) |
Belgium  |
3 (0%) |
Dominican Republic  |
3 (0%) |
Latvia  |
3 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
3 (0%) |
Albania  |
3 (0%) |
Czechia  |
3 (0%) |
Norway  |
3 (0%) |
Croatia  |
3 (0%) |
Georgia  |
3 (0%) |
Bangladesh  |
3 (0%) |
Bolivia  |
3 (0%) |
Jersey  |
2 (0%) |
Belarus  |
2 (0%) |
Kazakhstan  |
2 (0%) |
Guatemala  |
2 (0%) |
Lithuania  |
2 (0%) |
Sierra Leone  |
2 (0%) |
Zimbabwe  |
2 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of  |
2 (0%) |
Gabon  |
2 (0%) |
Senegal  |
2 (0%) |
Uzbekistan  |
2 (0%) |
Ghana  |
2 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire  |
2 (0%) |
Nicaragua  |
2 (0%) |
Switzerland  |
2 (0%) |
Botswana  |
2 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
2 (0%) |
Rwanda  |
2 (0%) |
XK  |
1 (0%) |
Equatorial Guinea  |
1 (0%) |
Kyrgyzstan  |
1 (0%) |
Monaco  |
1 (0%) |
Reunion  |
1 (0%) |
Estonia  |
1 (0%) |
Mali  |
1 (0%) |
Malta  |
1 (0%) |
Philippines  |
1 (0%) |
Serbia  |
1 (0%) |
Martinique  |
1 (0%) |
Togo  |
1 (0%) |
Uganda  |
1 (0%) |
Greece  |
1 (0%) |
Liberia  |
1 (0%) |
Madagascar  |
1 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
1 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
1 (0%) |
Venezuela  |
1 (0%) |
Congo  |
1 (0%) |
Uruguay  |
1 (0%) |
Virgin Islands (U.S.)  |
1 (0%) |
Congo  |
1 (0%) |
Montenegro  |
1 (0%) |
Oman  |
1 (0%) |
Yemen  |
1 (0%) |
Paraguay  |
1 (0%) |
Jordan  |
1 (0%) |
Cabo Verde  |
1 (0%) |
Libya  |
1 (0%) |
Costa Rica  |
1 (0%) |