LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- A common EU migration policy? EU immigration and asylum policy from the perspective of regime complexity
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2013
- Author/s
- Plathner, Christine
- Department/s
- Department of Political Science
- In LUP since
- 2013-09-02
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 1726 | 92 | 2 |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ![]() |
263 (15%) |
Sweden ![]() |
181 (10%) |
Germany ![]() |
164 (10%) |
United States of America ![]() |
126 (7%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ![]() |
89 (5%) |
Hong Kong (China) ![]() |
85 (5%) |
China ![]() |
52 (3%) |
Russian Federation ![]() |
48 (3%) |
Belgium ![]() |
48 (3%) |
Turkiye ![]() |
47 (3%) |
Italy ![]() |
41 (2%) |
France ![]() |
34 (2%) |
Ukraine ![]() |
33 (2%) |
Palestinian Territory ![]() |
30 (2%) |
Indonesia ![]() |
28 (2%) |
Denmark ![]() |
26 (2%) |
Czechia ![]() |
25 (1%) |
Romania ![]() |
24 (1%) |
Poland ![]() |
22 (1%) |
Greece ![]() |
20 (1%) |
Malta ![]() |
19 (1%) |
Spain ![]() |
14 (1%) |
Switzerland ![]() |
14 (1%) |
Canada ![]() |
12 (1%) |
Ireland ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Israel ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Finland ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Estonia ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Singapore ![]() |
10 (1%) |
India ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Slovakia ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Brazil ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Norway ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Portugal ![]() |
8 (0%) |
Philippines ![]() |
8 (0%) |
Croatia ![]() |
8 (0%) |
Australia ![]() |
8 (0%) |
Japan ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Hungary ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Viet Nam ![]() |
7 (0%) |
South Korea ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Pakistan ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Azerbaijan ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Kyrgyzstan ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Slovenia ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Thailand ![]() |
6 (0%) |
South Africa ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Austria ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Argentina ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Lithuania ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Egypt ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Colombia ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Reunion ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Iran ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Armenia ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Iceland ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Mexico ![]() |
3 (0%) |
New Zealand ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Bulgaria ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Malaysia ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Ghana ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Kenya ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Ethiopia ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Algeria ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Kazakhstan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Nigeria ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Luxembourg ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Iraq ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Nepal ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Serbia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Jordan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Guyana ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Macedonia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Senegal ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Latvia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Jersey ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Albania ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Venezuela ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Unknown ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Lesotho ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Taiwan (China) ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Saint Lucia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
European Union location ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Tajikistan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Holy See ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Myanmar ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Guatemala ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Lebanon ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Rwanda ![]() |
1 (0%) |


























































































