Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Möjligheter och problem med integration av hanteringen av antagonistiska och olycksrelaterade risker - En jämförelse med utgångspunkt från två konsultföretags arbetssätt

Johansson, Jon and Nilsson, Jane (2005) In LUTVDG/TVBB--5183--SE
Division of Fire Safety Engineering
Risk Management and Safety Engineering (M.Sc.Eng.)
Division of Risk Management and Societal Safety
Abstract
The aim of this report is to investigate, on the basis of two consult agencies perspectives, what the possibilities and obstacles are to integrate the work with antagonistic and accident related risks. The report is based on two consult agencies where each agency´s work procedure is represented by a risk management method. The work with accident related and antagonistic risks is analysed and evaluated compared to four different components. The components are risk management process (IEC´s and FEMA´s model), driving forces, education and competence, and resources to control risk management with COSO?´s ERM framework. On the basis of the components the authors discuss the possibilities and obstacles concerning the integration. The results... (More)
The aim of this report is to investigate, on the basis of two consult agencies perspectives, what the possibilities and obstacles are to integrate the work with antagonistic and accident related risks. The report is based on two consult agencies where each agency´s work procedure is represented by a risk management method. The work with accident related and antagonistic risks is analysed and evaluated compared to four different components. The components are risk management process (IEC´s and FEMA´s model), driving forces, education and competence, and resources to control risk management with COSO?´s ERM framework. On the basis of the components the authors discuss the possibilities and obstacles concerning the integration. The results from the analysis are compared with the result from interviews with people working with risk management: The interviewed people were asked how they regard the possibilities and obstacles concerning integration of risk management methods. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Johansson, Jon and Nilsson, Jane
supervisor
organization
year
type
H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
subject
keywords
Terrorism, Risk Management and Safety engineering, Enterprise risk management, Antagonistiska risker, Technological sciences, Risker, Antagonistic risks, Sabotage, Riskhantering, Teknik
publication/series
LUTVDG/TVBB--5183--SE
report number
5183
ISSN
1402-3504
language
Swedish
additional info
Rapport 5183
id
1324247
date added to LUP
2007-01-28 00:00:00
date last changed
2020-12-03 14:26:03
@misc{1324247,
  abstract     = {{The aim of this report is to investigate, on the basis of two consult agencies perspectives, what the possibilities and obstacles are to integrate the work with antagonistic and accident related risks. The report is based on two consult agencies where each agency´s work procedure is represented by a risk management method. The work with accident related and antagonistic risks is analysed and evaluated compared to four different components. The components are risk management process (IEC´s and FEMA´s model), driving forces, education and competence, and resources to control risk management with COSO?´s ERM framework. On the basis of the components the authors discuss the possibilities and obstacles concerning the integration. The results from the analysis are compared with the result from interviews with people working with risk management: The interviewed people were asked how they regard the possibilities and obstacles concerning integration of risk management methods.}},
  author       = {{Johansson, Jon and Nilsson, Jane}},
  issn         = {{1402-3504}},
  language     = {{swe}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  series       = {{LUTVDG/TVBB--5183--SE}},
  title        = {{Möjligheter och problem med integration av hanteringen av antagonistiska och olycksrelaterade risker - En jämförelse med utgångspunkt från två konsultföretags arbetssätt}},
  year         = {{2005}},
}