Non-Identity. Att undkomma ett moralfilosofiskt moment 22
(2005)Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- Can we harm future people? According to our commonly used contractarian theories, it seems we cannot. This is because our actions of today not only influence what they are supposed to influence, but also who mates with whom and when, and thus which particular persons will ever live in the future. Had we not performed a particular action, the future people born as a result of that same action, would not have been born. It therefore seems they cannot reasonably reject our actions. The paradox this poses has been known as The Non-Identity Problem.
In this essay, we critically review the discourse on The Non-Identity Problem and analyse the most important attempts to solve this intricate puzzle. We argue that The Non-Identity Problem is not... (More) - Can we harm future people? According to our commonly used contractarian theories, it seems we cannot. This is because our actions of today not only influence what they are supposed to influence, but also who mates with whom and when, and thus which particular persons will ever live in the future. Had we not performed a particular action, the future people born as a result of that same action, would not have been born. It therefore seems they cannot reasonably reject our actions. The paradox this poses has been known as The Non-Identity Problem.
In this essay, we critically review the discourse on The Non-Identity Problem and analyse the most important attempts to solve this intricate puzzle. We argue that The Non-Identity Problem is not possible to solve using consequentialistic theories of ethics, but that a non-consequentialistic solution is possible. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/1330527
- author
- Hellström, Martin and Ohlström, Marcus
- supervisor
- organization
- year
- 2005
- type
- L2 - 2nd term paper (old degree order)
- subject
- keywords
- non-identity, intergenerational justice, distributive justice, population policy, Social sciences, Samhällsvetenskaper, Political and administrative sciences, Statsvetenskap, förvaltningskunskap
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 1330527
- date added to LUP
- 2005-06-10 00:00:00
- date last changed
- 2005-06-10 00:00:00
@misc{1330527,
abstract = {{Can we harm future people? According to our commonly used contractarian theories, it seems we cannot. This is because our actions of today not only influence what they are supposed to influence, but also who mates with whom and when, and thus which particular persons will ever live in the future. Had we not performed a particular action, the future people born as a result of that same action, would not have been born. It therefore seems they cannot reasonably reject our actions. The paradox this poses has been known as The Non-Identity Problem.
In this essay, we critically review the discourse on The Non-Identity Problem and analyse the most important attempts to solve this intricate puzzle. We argue that The Non-Identity Problem is not possible to solve using consequentialistic theories of ethics, but that a non-consequentialistic solution is possible.}},
author = {{Hellström, Martin and Ohlström, Marcus}},
language = {{swe}},
note = {{Student Paper}},
title = {{Non-Identity. Att undkomma ett moralfilosofiskt moment 22}},
year = {{2005}},
}