Missbruk inom arbetslivet: en undersökning om skyldigheter, åtgärder och könsdominansens betydelse
(2001)School of Social Work
- Abstract
- The purpose with this essay was to investigate if the sexmajority at work has any meaning for how the parties concerned act with abuseproblems. The essay was built on following questions: What obligations does an employer have when abuse occurs at work? What measures and comtributions are being used in abuse? How is abuse defined? What is thought about drogtests and is it being used? Are the abuseproblems being discovered differently depending on the sexdomination at work? Thoroughly interviews have been done in an average urban district in the south of Sweden. Together with litteraturestudies these interviews have been the bricks in this essay. According to swedish legislation the employer has obligations to take actions against... (More)
- The purpose with this essay was to investigate if the sexmajority at work has any meaning for how the parties concerned act with abuseproblems. The essay was built on following questions: What obligations does an employer have when abuse occurs at work? What measures and comtributions are being used in abuse? How is abuse defined? What is thought about drogtests and is it being used? Are the abuseproblems being discovered differently depending on the sexdomination at work? Thoroughly interviews have been done in an average urban district in the south of Sweden. Together with litteraturestudies these interviews have been the bricks in this essay. According to swedish legislation the employer has obligations to take actions against abuseproblems. Other results that has shown is that X urban district has a drogpolicy that doesn´t work well. Few of the persons being interviewed knew about its existence. It appeared in the interviews that abuseproblems exists at the parties concerned, but not in their own place of work. An essential conclusion is that sexdomination at work doesn´t have any meaning for how you act when abuse is being discovered. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/1358639
- author
- Claesén, Maria and ,
- supervisor
- organization
- year
- 2001
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- Social problems and welfare, national insurance, Sociala problem, social välfärd, socialförsäkring
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 1358639
- date added to LUP
- 2004-11-08 00:00:00
- date last changed
- 2004-11-08 00:00:00
@misc{1358639,
abstract = {{The purpose with this essay was to investigate if the sexmajority at work has any meaning for how the parties concerned act with abuseproblems. The essay was built on following questions: What obligations does an employer have when abuse occurs at work? What measures and comtributions are being used in abuse? How is abuse defined? What is thought about drogtests and is it being used? Are the abuseproblems being discovered differently depending on the sexdomination at work? Thoroughly interviews have been done in an average urban district in the south of Sweden. Together with litteraturestudies these interviews have been the bricks in this essay. According to swedish legislation the employer has obligations to take actions against abuseproblems. Other results that has shown is that X urban district has a drogpolicy that doesn´t work well. Few of the persons being interviewed knew about its existence. It appeared in the interviews that abuseproblems exists at the parties concerned, but not in their own place of work. An essential conclusion is that sexdomination at work doesn´t have any meaning for how you act when abuse is being discovered.}},
author = {{Claesén, Maria and ,}},
language = {{swe}},
note = {{Student Paper}},
title = {{Missbruk inom arbetslivet: en undersökning om skyldigheter, åtgärder och könsdominansens betydelse}},
year = {{2001}},
}