Existerar en gemensam asylpolitik inom Schengensamarbetet?
(2010) STVM01 20101Department of Political Science
- Abstract (Swedish)
- The question and purpose of this thesis is to evaluate whether the cooperation within the Schengen Agreement regarding asylum politics is common or shared? By common is meant that the member states act in common and follow the regulation jointly. Whereas, shared is defined as a regulation which provide room for interpretation and implementation on national level. This thesis is based on literature and documents about the harmonization the Schengen cooperation. Material has been collected from governmental websites and public libraries. Since this study regards cooperation, the theories neo-functionalism and liberal intergovernmental theory have been chosen because they provide opposite views on the reasons and factors for integration. A... (More)
- The question and purpose of this thesis is to evaluate whether the cooperation within the Schengen Agreement regarding asylum politics is common or shared? By common is meant that the member states act in common and follow the regulation jointly. Whereas, shared is defined as a regulation which provide room for interpretation and implementation on national level. This thesis is based on literature and documents about the harmonization the Schengen cooperation. Material has been collected from governmental websites and public libraries. Since this study regards cooperation, the theories neo-functionalism and liberal intergovernmental theory have been chosen because they provide opposite views on the reasons and factors for integration. A couple of articles from newspapers’ Internet based archives have been used to explain
similarities and differences within the asylum politics. The main highlights and conclusion of the analysis are the consequences of
countries not meeting the minimum standards. The conclusion is that there are some common regulations within the cooperation regarding asylum politics, but the deficiencies in the shared politics make it difficult for member states to meet some of the other regulations. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/1608247
- author
- Segerström, Jenny LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- STVM01 20101
- year
- 2010
- type
- H1 - Master's Degree (One Year)
- subject
- keywords
- asylum, liberal intergovernmental theory, neo-functionalism, Schengen, cooperation, common, shared
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 1608247
- date added to LUP
- 2010-06-29 16:02:22
- date last changed
- 2010-06-29 16:02:22
@misc{1608247,
abstract = {{The question and purpose of this thesis is to evaluate whether the cooperation within the Schengen Agreement regarding asylum politics is common or shared? By common is meant that the member states act in common and follow the regulation jointly. Whereas, shared is defined as a regulation which provide room for interpretation and implementation on national level. This thesis is based on literature and documents about the harmonization the Schengen cooperation. Material has been collected from governmental websites and public libraries. Since this study regards cooperation, the theories neo-functionalism and liberal intergovernmental theory have been chosen because they provide opposite views on the reasons and factors for integration. A couple of articles from newspapers’ Internet based archives have been used to explain
similarities and differences within the asylum politics. The main highlights and conclusion of the analysis are the consequences of
countries not meeting the minimum standards. The conclusion is that there are some common regulations within the cooperation regarding asylum politics, but the deficiencies in the shared politics make it difficult for member states to meet some of the other regulations.}},
author = {{Segerström, Jenny}},
language = {{swe}},
note = {{Student Paper}},
title = {{Existerar en gemensam asylpolitik inom Schengensamarbetet?}},
year = {{2010}},
}