Advanced

The Subjectivity of Consent: A Comparison of the Trafficking Protocol and Slavery Convention

Raw, Annabel LU (2012) JAMM04 20121
Department of Law
Abstract
The aim of this research paper is to evaluate the extent to which the definition of slavery, exemplified through the 1926 Slavery Convention, offers a viable alternative to the definition of human trafficking under the 2000 Trafficking Protocol. The focus of the comparison centres on the role of consent on behalf of trafficked or enslaved persons, embedded in the respective definitions, and the function of these constructions in the constitution of subjectivity. The role of consent, and the powers that influence it, are examined through a Foucauldian perspective of the subject and related to a critical view of human rights subjectivity. Through examining the legal formulation of the trafficking definition, its broader legal context, and... (More)
The aim of this research paper is to evaluate the extent to which the definition of slavery, exemplified through the 1926 Slavery Convention, offers a viable alternative to the definition of human trafficking under the 2000 Trafficking Protocol. The focus of the comparison centres on the role of consent on behalf of trafficked or enslaved persons, embedded in the respective definitions, and the function of these constructions in the constitution of subjectivity. The role of consent, and the powers that influence it, are examined through a Foucauldian perspective of the subject and related to a critical view of human rights subjectivity. Through examining the legal formulation of the trafficking definition, its broader legal context, and the discourse in which it is embedded, the human trafficking framework is found to present a problematic construction of consent from the view of the analytical tools provided. Under the slavery framework, the definition (based on the exercise of powers of ownership) is developed on an abstract level that indicates both its efficacy and its preferable accommodation of consent and subjectivity. Two cases are selected from Sweden (B-982-05 / B-626-06) and Australia (R v. Tang) to give examples of the trafficking and slavery frameworks respectively. In conclusion, the research finds the Slavery Convention definition to provide a viable alternative to the trafficking framework, in packaging a favourable accommodation of consent, a broader understanding of power and culpability and the opportunity for a critical constitution of subjectivity that permits an on-going critique on the boundaries of freedom and exploitation. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Raw, Annabel LU
supervisor
organization
course
JAMM04 20121
year
type
H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
subject
keywords
Slavery, Trafficking, Consent
language
English
id
2701914
date added to LUP
2012-10-15 12:58:01
date last changed
2012-10-15 12:58:01
@misc{2701914,
  abstract     = {The aim of this research paper is to evaluate the extent to which the definition of slavery, exemplified through the 1926 Slavery Convention, offers a viable alternative to the definition of human trafficking under the 2000 Trafficking Protocol. The focus of the comparison centres on the role of consent on behalf of trafficked or enslaved persons, embedded in the respective definitions, and the function of these constructions in the constitution of subjectivity. The role of consent, and the powers that influence it, are examined through a Foucauldian perspective of the subject and related to a critical view of human rights subjectivity. Through examining the legal formulation of the trafficking definition, its broader legal context, and the discourse in which it is embedded, the human trafficking framework is found to present a problematic construction of consent from the view of the analytical tools provided. Under the slavery framework, the definition (based on the exercise of powers of ownership) is developed on an abstract level that indicates both its efficacy and its preferable accommodation of consent and subjectivity. Two cases are selected from Sweden (B-982-05 / B-626-06) and Australia (R v. Tang) to give examples of the trafficking and slavery frameworks respectively. In conclusion, the research finds the Slavery Convention definition to provide a viable alternative to the trafficking framework, in packaging a favourable accommodation of consent, a broader understanding of power and culpability and the opportunity for a critical constitution of subjectivity that permits an on-going critique on the boundaries of freedom and exploitation.},
  author       = {Raw, Annabel},
  keyword      = {Slavery,Trafficking,Consent},
  language     = {eng},
  note         = {Student Paper},
  title        = {The Subjectivity of Consent: A Comparison of the Trafficking Protocol and Slavery Convention},
  year         = {2012},
}