Analys av en statlig utredning – en diskursanalys om hur missbruk, beroende, tvång och individ beskrivs i missbruksutredningen (SOU 2011:35)
(2013) SOPA63 20122School of Social Work
- Abstract
- The purpose of this study was to analyze from a discourse analytic perspective how The Substance Abuse commissions final report, Improved interventions for substance abuse and dependence - the individual, knowledge and responsibility (SOU 2011:35) (Bättre insatser vid missbruk och beroende – individen, kunskapen och ansvaret), chapter 7, constructs discourses in relation to concepts such as substance abuse, substance addiction and the individual in relation to coercion. The starting point of the study was that through a qualitative approach in the form of critical discourse analysis and discourse theory analyze different concepts. We found three different discourses in the context of SOU 2011:35, chapter 7. The analysis found that a... (More)
- The purpose of this study was to analyze from a discourse analytic perspective how The Substance Abuse commissions final report, Improved interventions for substance abuse and dependence - the individual, knowledge and responsibility (SOU 2011:35) (Bättre insatser vid missbruk och beroende – individen, kunskapen och ansvaret), chapter 7, constructs discourses in relation to concepts such as substance abuse, substance addiction and the individual in relation to coercion. The starting point of the study was that through a qualitative approach in the form of critical discourse analysis and discourse theory analyze different concepts. We found three different discourses in the context of SOU 2011:35, chapter 7. The analysis found that a medical discourse has come the farthest in a striving for hegemony in the construct of substance abuse and substance dependence, as well as the individual came to appear as distinct depending on the perception of substance abuse and substance addiction, as well as the measures advocated. A social discourse and penal discourse is less perceptible in SOU 2011:35. This also has implications for what SOU 2011:35 proposes a change to legislation. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/3410741
- author
- Stenberg, Carl-Johan LU and Erlandsson, Karl LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- SOPA63 20122
- year
- 2013
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- Discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, health care-discourse, social discourse, penal discourse, coercion
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 3410741
- date added to LUP
- 2013-01-29 09:46:07
- date last changed
- 2013-01-29 09:46:07
@misc{3410741, abstract = {{The purpose of this study was to analyze from a discourse analytic perspective how The Substance Abuse commissions final report, Improved interventions for substance abuse and dependence - the individual, knowledge and responsibility (SOU 2011:35) (Bättre insatser vid missbruk och beroende – individen, kunskapen och ansvaret), chapter 7, constructs discourses in relation to concepts such as substance abuse, substance addiction and the individual in relation to coercion. The starting point of the study was that through a qualitative approach in the form of critical discourse analysis and discourse theory analyze different concepts. We found three different discourses in the context of SOU 2011:35, chapter 7. The analysis found that a medical discourse has come the farthest in a striving for hegemony in the construct of substance abuse and substance dependence, as well as the individual came to appear as distinct depending on the perception of substance abuse and substance addiction, as well as the measures advocated. A social discourse and penal discourse is less perceptible in SOU 2011:35. This also has implications for what SOU 2011:35 proposes a change to legislation.}}, author = {{Stenberg, Carl-Johan and Erlandsson, Karl}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Analys av en statlig utredning – en diskursanalys om hur missbruk, beroende, tvång och individ beskrivs i missbruksutredningen (SOU 2011:35)}}, year = {{2013}}, }