Advanced

Terroristen som slöt cirkeln - Terrorismdiskurs i DN och Aftonbladet efter bombdådet i Stockholm 2010

Tidå, Benjamin LU (2013) STVK02 20131
Department of Political Science
Human Rights Studies
Abstract
In this paper I examine the Swedish discourse on terrorism to be found in the Swedish newspapers Dagens Nyheter and Aftonbladet following the bombings in Stockholm 2010.The research question that the paper revolves around is: What discourse on terrorism was dominating Swedish media following the bombings in Stockholm 2010 and what discourse was the strongest challenger? Which are the discourses’ nodal points and what are the main antagonisms to be found?

As is revealed within the terminology of my research question, I will use the work of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe to develop a method of analysis. I will identify one dominating discourse and one challenging discourse by constructing chains of equivalences. I will argue that both... (More)
In this paper I examine the Swedish discourse on terrorism to be found in the Swedish newspapers Dagens Nyheter and Aftonbladet following the bombings in Stockholm 2010.The research question that the paper revolves around is: What discourse on terrorism was dominating Swedish media following the bombings in Stockholm 2010 and what discourse was the strongest challenger? Which are the discourses’ nodal points and what are the main antagonisms to be found?

As is revealed within the terminology of my research question, I will use the work of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe to develop a method of analysis. I will identify one dominating discourse and one challenging discourse by constructing chains of equivalences. I will argue that both discourses have the same nodal points, “The Other” and “We”, even though the different discourses put different meanings into these perceived political units. Hence, the sheer notion of the existence of a division between “Us” and “The Other” has a hegemonic position, while there is a lot of antagonism about what these units consists of. I will argue that there is a particularly strong antagonism around the position of Islam in the dominating discourse on terrorism. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Tidå, Benjamin LU
supervisor
organization
course
STVK02 20131
year
type
M2 - Bachelor Degree
subject
keywords
Terrorism, Diskursanalys, Den Andre, Vi, Islam
language
Swedish
id
3798509
date added to LUP
2013-07-01 12:57:50
date last changed
2014-09-04 08:27:38
@misc{3798509,
  abstract     = {In this paper I examine the Swedish discourse on terrorism to be found in the Swedish newspapers Dagens Nyheter and Aftonbladet following the bombings in Stockholm 2010.The research question that the paper revolves around is: What discourse on terrorism was dominating Swedish media following the bombings in Stockholm 2010 and what discourse was the strongest challenger? Which are the discourses’ nodal points and what are the main antagonisms to be found?

As is revealed within the terminology of my research question, I will use the work of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe to develop a method of analysis. I will identify one dominating discourse and one challenging discourse by constructing chains of equivalences. I will argue that both discourses have the same nodal points, “The Other” and “We”, even though the different discourses put different meanings into these perceived political units. Hence, the sheer notion of the existence of a division between “Us” and “The Other” has a hegemonic position, while there is a lot of antagonism about what these units consists of. I will argue that there is a particularly strong antagonism around the position of Islam in the dominating discourse on terrorism.},
  author       = {Tidå, Benjamin},
  keyword      = {Terrorism,Diskursanalys,Den Andre,Vi,Islam},
  language     = {swe},
  note         = {Student Paper},
  title        = {Terroristen som slöt cirkeln - Terrorismdiskurs i DN och Aftonbladet efter bombdådet i Stockholm 2010},
  year         = {2013},
}