Comparative Analysis of the United Kingdom Judicial Anti- Avoidance Rule and GAAR of Canada - Lesson for the UK from Canada
(2013) HARN60 20131Department of Business Law
- Abstract (Swedish)
- This article examines whether the current UK judicial approach is an adequacy of the judicial approach Rule of law and GAAR and studies the historical experience of Canada with its statutory solutions. Based on the comparative study background, the article considers to a large extent, a statutory general anti-avoidance principle might assist with the problems of statutory interpretation in the United Kingdom.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/3800633
- author
- Liang, Bing LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- HARN60 20131
- year
- 2013
- type
- H1 - Master's Degree (One Year)
- subject
- keywords
- ITA Canada’s Income Tax Act GAAR General Anti-Avoidance Rule SAAR Specific Anti-Avoidance Rule CGT Capital Gains Tax GANTIP General Anti-Avoidance principle MNES Multi-National Enterprise
- language
- English
- id
- 3800633
- date added to LUP
- 2014-01-27 10:18:23
- date last changed
- 2014-01-27 10:18:23
@misc{3800633, abstract = {{This article examines whether the current UK judicial approach is an adequacy of the judicial approach Rule of law and GAAR and studies the historical experience of Canada with its statutory solutions. Based on the comparative study background, the article considers to a large extent, a statutory general anti-avoidance principle might assist with the problems of statutory interpretation in the United Kingdom.}}, author = {{Liang, Bing}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Comparative Analysis of the United Kingdom Judicial Anti- Avoidance Rule and GAAR of Canada - Lesson for the UK from Canada}}, year = {{2013}}, }