Komma överens -En studie om EU-länders varierande grad av compliance
(2013) STVK02 20132Human Rights Studies
Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- This study researches why some countries are better than others in reaching compliance in the EU. The analysis is based on quantitative infringement data which is compared to six variables about the countries structural and political qualities. The results will be evaluated by two main theories, which are liberal intergovernmentalism and neofunktionalism. Compliance is hard to study due to its weak established meaning and therefore, one of the challenges in this study is to describe what compliance is. The term has a legalistic meaning but could also have a social one and therefore the dependent variable is chosen to be infringements noticed by the European commission. The infringements data are build on notification about some kind of... (More)
- This study researches why some countries are better than others in reaching compliance in the EU. The analysis is based on quantitative infringement data which is compared to six variables about the countries structural and political qualities. The results will be evaluated by two main theories, which are liberal intergovernmentalism and neofunktionalism. Compliance is hard to study due to its weak established meaning and therefore, one of the challenges in this study is to describe what compliance is. The term has a legalistic meaning but could also have a social one and therefore the dependent variable is chosen to be infringements noticed by the European commission. The infringements data are build on notification about some kind of small
The conclusion will make a point of the difficultness to give a straight answer about the theories reliability to compliance. The main answer will therefore be that the neofunktionalistic view gives a more constructivistic answer and liberal intergovernmentalism a description of the mechanism to compliance between countries in the first place.
compliance, EU, intergovernmentalism, neofunktionalism, överträdelser (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/4128401
- author
- Gustafsson, Johannes LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- STVK02 20132
- year
- 2013
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- neofunktionalism, överträdelser, EU, compliance, intergovernmentalism
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 4128401
- date added to LUP
- 2014-03-03 17:01:35
- date last changed
- 2014-09-04 08:27:44
@misc{4128401, abstract = {{This study researches why some countries are better than others in reaching compliance in the EU. The analysis is based on quantitative infringement data which is compared to six variables about the countries structural and political qualities. The results will be evaluated by two main theories, which are liberal intergovernmentalism and neofunktionalism. Compliance is hard to study due to its weak established meaning and therefore, one of the challenges in this study is to describe what compliance is. The term has a legalistic meaning but could also have a social one and therefore the dependent variable is chosen to be infringements noticed by the European commission. The infringements data are build on notification about some kind of small The conclusion will make a point of the difficultness to give a straight answer about the theories reliability to compliance. The main answer will therefore be that the neofunktionalistic view gives a more constructivistic answer and liberal intergovernmentalism a description of the mechanism to compliance between countries in the first place. compliance, EU, intergovernmentalism, neofunktionalism, överträdelser}}, author = {{Gustafsson, Johannes}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Komma överens -En studie om EU-länders varierande grad av compliance}}, year = {{2013}}, }