Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Measuring Risk for WTI Crude Oil - An application of Value-at-Risk

Eriksson, Alexander LU and Ljungqvist, Jonathan LU (2014) NEKN01 20141
Department of Economics
Abstract (Swedish)
Crude oil is the most traded energy commodity in the world, and its price has a large impact on the everyday life of billions. Given the volatility of crude oil prices and its enormous effects on economies worldwide, there has been a growing demand for risk quantification and risk management for the market participants. The measurement known as Value-at-Risk (VaR) has become the industry standard for internal risk control among firms, financial institutions and regulators. This study will assess which VaR method is most effective to quantify the risk of price changes embedded in the West Texas Intermediate (WTI); used as a benchmark for oil prices in the USA. VaR will be estimated by using both parametric and non-parametric methods that... (More)
Crude oil is the most traded energy commodity in the world, and its price has a large impact on the everyday life of billions. Given the volatility of crude oil prices and its enormous effects on economies worldwide, there has been a growing demand for risk quantification and risk management for the market participants. The measurement known as Value-at-Risk (VaR) has become the industry standard for internal risk control among firms, financial institutions and regulators. This study will assess which VaR method is most effective to quantify the risk of price changes embedded in the West Texas Intermediate (WTI); used as a benchmark for oil prices in the USA. VaR will be estimated by using both parametric and non-parametric methods that will be backtested with the Christoffersen test. The parametric methods considered in this paper are the GARCH, EGARCH, and TGARCH models, estimated by considering the effects of using normal distribution versus student’s t-distribution or the Generalized Error Distribution (GED). The non-parametric methods used in this paper are Basic Historical Simulation (BHS), Volatility-Weighted Historical Simulation (VWHS), and Age Weighted Historical Simulation (AWHS). This study also tries to answer if the optimal choice of VaR estimation method differs when evaluating WTI Crude Oil prices as opposed to the S&P 500 index. The parametric models had an in-sample of 1000 observations and estimated a one day-ahead VaR estimate over the period 2007-01-01 to 2013-12-31.The model was re-estimated every day in the period to a total of 1826 estimations. The non-parametric models had an in-sample of 1000, and the volatility calculated for VWHS used the RiskMetric approach. For both S&P 500 and WTI the non-parametric methods provided poor VaR estimates. The parametric models provided better results, the GARCH models with leptokurtic distribution was the most effective in capturing price volatility. GARCH(1,1) with GED provided the best result for WTI, while GARCH(2,1) with t-distribution was the more optimal model to capture volatility in the S&P 500 index. Thus, we conclude that different models are needed to accurately capture the risk depending on which benchmark is used. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Eriksson, Alexander LU and Ljungqvist, Jonathan LU
supervisor
organization
course
NEKN01 20141
year
type
H1 - Master's Degree (One Year)
subject
keywords
Market Risk, VaR, Crude oil, Forecasting
language
English
id
4668222
date added to LUP
2014-09-24 14:24:12
date last changed
2014-09-24 14:24:12
@misc{4668222,
  abstract     = {{Crude oil is the most traded energy commodity in the world, and its price has a large impact on the everyday life of billions. Given the volatility of crude oil prices and its enormous effects on economies worldwide, there has been a growing demand for risk quantification and risk management for the market participants. The measurement known as Value-at-Risk (VaR) has become the industry standard for internal risk control among firms, financial institutions and regulators. This study will assess which VaR method is most effective to quantify the risk of price changes embedded in the West Texas Intermediate (WTI); used as a benchmark for oil prices in the USA. VaR will be estimated by using both parametric and non-parametric methods that will be backtested with the Christoffersen test. The parametric methods considered in this paper are the GARCH, EGARCH, and TGARCH models, estimated by considering the effects of using normal distribution versus student’s t-distribution or the Generalized Error Distribution (GED). The non-parametric methods used in this paper are Basic Historical Simulation (BHS), Volatility-Weighted Historical Simulation (VWHS), and Age Weighted Historical Simulation (AWHS). This study also tries to answer if the optimal choice of VaR estimation method differs when evaluating WTI Crude Oil prices as opposed to the S&P 500 index. The parametric models had an in-sample of 1000 observations and estimated a one day-ahead VaR estimate over the period 2007-01-01 to 2013-12-31.The model was re-estimated every day in the period to a total of 1826 estimations. The non-parametric models had an in-sample of 1000, and the volatility calculated for VWHS used the RiskMetric approach. For both S&P 500 and WTI the non-parametric methods provided poor VaR estimates. The parametric models provided better results, the GARCH models with leptokurtic distribution was the most effective in capturing price volatility. GARCH(1,1) with GED provided the best result for WTI, while GARCH(2,1) with t-distribution was the more optimal model to capture volatility in the S&P 500 index. Thus, we conclude that different models are needed to accurately capture the risk depending on which benchmark is used.}},
  author       = {{Eriksson, Alexander and Ljungqvist, Jonathan}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Measuring Risk for WTI Crude Oil - An application of Value-at-Risk}},
  year         = {{2014}},
}