Senkaku/Diaoyu-dispyten : en retorisk analys kring suveränitet
(2015) MRSK30 20131Human Rights Studies
- Abstract
- The relationship between Japan and China has historically been problematic and, in many aspects, it still is. One contemporary issue where the two states cannot agree is the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands dispute. Both states claim sovereignty over the islands, and there seem to be no end to the dispute anytime soon. A possible escalation of the dispute could have a very negative impact on the whole East Asian region. Due to the complexity and topicality of the issue, deeper understanding of all aspects of the dispute is highly relevant. In this essay I will take a closer look on the two states argument for sovereignty over the islands. I will examine: how China’s and Japan’s arguments comply with certain rhetorical rules; and also how their... (More)
- The relationship between Japan and China has historically been problematic and, in many aspects, it still is. One contemporary issue where the two states cannot agree is the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands dispute. Both states claim sovereignty over the islands, and there seem to be no end to the dispute anytime soon. A possible escalation of the dispute could have a very negative impact on the whole East Asian region. Due to the complexity and topicality of the issue, deeper understanding of all aspects of the dispute is highly relevant. In this essay I will take a closer look on the two states argument for sovereignty over the islands. I will examine: how China’s and Japan’s arguments comply with certain rhetorical rules; and also how their claimed grounds for sovereignty over the islands can be connected to different definitions of sovereignty. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/4933349
- author
- Kjellman, Sebastian LU
- supervisor
-
- Lina Sturfelt LU
- Andrea Karlsson LU
- organization
- course
- MRSK30 20131
- year
- 2015
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- rhetorical analysis, island dispute, Japan-China relation, sovereignty, Senkaku/Diaoyu
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 4933349
- date added to LUP
- 2015-02-12 17:30:20
- date last changed
- 2015-02-12 17:30:20
@misc{4933349, abstract = {{The relationship between Japan and China has historically been problematic and, in many aspects, it still is. One contemporary issue where the two states cannot agree is the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands dispute. Both states claim sovereignty over the islands, and there seem to be no end to the dispute anytime soon. A possible escalation of the dispute could have a very negative impact on the whole East Asian region. Due to the complexity and topicality of the issue, deeper understanding of all aspects of the dispute is highly relevant. In this essay I will take a closer look on the two states argument for sovereignty over the islands. I will examine: how China’s and Japan’s arguments comply with certain rhetorical rules; and also how their claimed grounds for sovereignty over the islands can be connected to different definitions of sovereignty.}}, author = {{Kjellman, Sebastian}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Senkaku/Diaoyu-dispyten : en retorisk analys kring suveränitet}}, year = {{2015}}, }