Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Trade for Development? A moral political economy approach to the analysis of discourse in Sweden's Africa Policy

Abbaspour, Mona LU (2015) STVK12 20151
Department of Political Science
Abstract
In a globalized world where power-relations are changing, the need to reformulate the framework of global trade and trade-liberalization to be more conducive for development has been increasingly recognized in trade and development forums. This has resulted in increased donor focus on trade related development assistance and the moral justifications of trade-relations. This thesis set out to question possible assumptions made by the Swedish government on the moral purposes of global trade. Based on a moral political economy approach and critical discourse analysis, the central policy for the Swedish government’s African relations regime; ‘Sweden and Africa - a policy to address common challenges and opportunities’ is analyzed. Findings... (More)
In a globalized world where power-relations are changing, the need to reformulate the framework of global trade and trade-liberalization to be more conducive for development has been increasingly recognized in trade and development forums. This has resulted in increased donor focus on trade related development assistance and the moral justifications of trade-relations. This thesis set out to question possible assumptions made by the Swedish government on the moral purposes of global trade. Based on a moral political economy approach and critical discourse analysis, the central policy for the Swedish government’s African relations regime; ‘Sweden and Africa - a policy to address common challenges and opportunities’ is analyzed. Findings indicate that the discourses used in the Swedish policy contribute to the construction of ideologically hegemonic understandings of greater and deeper economic integration into the global trading system as essential to national development. It also finds that the discourses in the Swedish Africa policy seem to present freer trade and more open economies as a self-evident element of the future African development, excluding alternative notion’s of development and the role of trade in that process. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Abbaspour, Mona LU
supervisor
organization
course
STVK12 20151
year
type
M2 - Bachelor Degree
subject
keywords
Aid for Trade, Trade, Development, Sweden, Africa, Moral Political Economy
language
English
id
5435496
date added to LUP
2015-07-14 12:39:19
date last changed
2015-07-14 12:39:19
@misc{5435496,
  abstract     = {{In a globalized world where power-relations are changing, the need to reformulate the framework of global trade and trade-liberalization to be more conducive for development has been increasingly recognized in trade and development forums. This has resulted in increased donor focus on trade related development assistance and the moral justifications of trade-relations. This thesis set out to question possible assumptions made by the Swedish government on the moral purposes of global trade. Based on a moral political economy approach and critical discourse analysis, the central policy for the Swedish government’s African relations regime; ‘Sweden and Africa - a policy to address common challenges and opportunities’ is analyzed. Findings indicate that the discourses used in the Swedish policy contribute to the construction of ideologically hegemonic understandings of greater and deeper economic integration into the global trading system as essential to national development. It also finds that the discourses in the Swedish Africa policy seem to present freer trade and more open economies as a self-evident element of the future African development, excluding alternative notion’s of development and the role of trade in that process.}},
  author       = {{Abbaspour, Mona}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Trade for Development? A moral political economy approach to the analysis of discourse in Sweden's Africa Policy}},
  year         = {{2015}},
}