Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Creating the threat and ignoring the response: A critical comparison of discursive motivation within resolutions concerning Libya and Syria

Cervin, Fredrika LU (2018) FKVK02 20181
Department of Political Science
Abstract
In the spring of 2011, the populations in Libya and Syria rose against their governments, taking part in what would become known as the Arab Spring. The similarities of the two countries’ situations were striking, however the international response to the burgeoning crises diverged greatly. This study has tried to explain how – rather than why – interventions are motivated from discourse by looking at discourses within resolutions concerning Libya and Syria in the crisis’ early years. To answer this question a comparative critical discourse analysis combined with securitization and de-securitization moves, as developed by the Copenhagen School, have been applied to four central resolutions concerning the two cases. The comparative analysis... (More)
In the spring of 2011, the populations in Libya and Syria rose against their governments, taking part in what would become known as the Arab Spring. The similarities of the two countries’ situations were striking, however the international response to the burgeoning crises diverged greatly. This study has tried to explain how – rather than why – interventions are motivated from discourse by looking at discourses within resolutions concerning Libya and Syria in the crisis’ early years. To answer this question a comparative critical discourse analysis combined with securitization and de-securitization moves, as developed by the Copenhagen School, have been applied to four central resolutions concerning the two cases. The comparative analysis concluded that in both implicit and explicit terms the Libyan and Syrian discourses were constructed differently. This study further argued that a securitization of the Libyan conflict helped explain the intervention and similarly, a de-securitization of Syrian conflict helped explain the non-intervention. Overall this study tried to shed light on the paradoxical discursive treatment the two conflicts have endured while adding to the understanding on how linguistic structures and discourses motivate practice within the international environment. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Cervin, Fredrika LU
supervisor
organization
course
FKVK02 20181
year
type
M2 - Bachelor Degree
subject
keywords
Libya, Syria, securitization, discourse, threat, Security Council, resolutions, security, creation, Copenhagen School, critical discourse analysis
language
English
id
8942607
date added to LUP
2018-08-24 08:21:47
date last changed
2018-08-24 08:21:47
@misc{8942607,
  abstract     = {{In the spring of 2011, the populations in Libya and Syria rose against their governments, taking part in what would become known as the Arab Spring. The similarities of the two countries’ situations were striking, however the international response to the burgeoning crises diverged greatly. This study has tried to explain how – rather than why – interventions are motivated from discourse by looking at discourses within resolutions concerning Libya and Syria in the crisis’ early years. To answer this question a comparative critical discourse analysis combined with securitization and de-securitization moves, as developed by the Copenhagen School, have been applied to four central resolutions concerning the two cases. The comparative analysis concluded that in both implicit and explicit terms the Libyan and Syrian discourses were constructed differently. This study further argued that a securitization of the Libyan conflict helped explain the intervention and similarly, a de-securitization of Syrian conflict helped explain the non-intervention. Overall this study tried to shed light on the paradoxical discursive treatment the two conflicts have endured while adding to the understanding on how linguistic structures and discourses motivate practice within the international environment.}},
  author       = {{Cervin, Fredrika}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Creating the threat and ignoring the response: A critical comparison of discursive motivation within resolutions concerning Libya and Syria}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}