Vilka ord kan beskriva en familj? Ett sätt att fånga fler familjedimensioner.
(2018) PPTR06 20181Department of Psychology
- Abstract (Swedish)
- Undersökningen är indelad i två studier, studie 1 och studie 2. Syftet med studie 1 var att undersöka hur personal inom kommunal individ- och familjeomsorg och privat vårdkoncern värderade adjektiven i självskattningsformuläret Familjeklimat och om dessa uppfattades som positiva, neutrala eller negativa. I studie 2 som bestod av en klinisk och en icke-klinisk grupp undersöktes det om det gick att se några samband med formuläret Familjeklimats faktorindelning och de adjektiv som värderats med högst konsensus i studie 1.
För datainsamling användes enkäter som omarbetades till kvantifierbar data. I undersökningen studerades relationer mellan olika variabler för att se samband för vidare analys.
Resultatet i studie 1 visade att det rådde en... (More) - Undersökningen är indelad i två studier, studie 1 och studie 2. Syftet med studie 1 var att undersöka hur personal inom kommunal individ- och familjeomsorg och privat vårdkoncern värderade adjektiven i självskattningsformuläret Familjeklimat och om dessa uppfattades som positiva, neutrala eller negativa. I studie 2 som bestod av en klinisk och en icke-klinisk grupp undersöktes det om det gick att se några samband med formuläret Familjeklimats faktorindelning och de adjektiv som värderats med högst konsensus i studie 1.
För datainsamling användes enkäter som omarbetades till kvantifierbar data. I undersökningen studerades relationer mellan olika variabler för att se samband för vidare analys.
Resultatet i studie 1 visade att det rådde en mycket hög konsensus bland respondenterna när de värderade adjektiven inom kategorierna positiva och negativa. Kategorin neutrala adjektiv uteslöts då det ej uppnådde tillräckligt hög konsensus.
Resultatet i studie 2 visade att undersökningsgruppen som helhet bejakade de positiva adjektiven i mycket hög utsträckning och de negativa adjektiven i mycket mindre omfattning. Avseende skillnader mellan klinisk och icke-klinisk undersökningsgrupp framgick detta främst kring vilka positiva ord som bejakades samt att den kliniska undersökningsgruppen bejakade negativa adjektiv i högre utsträckning. Vidare visade resultat från självskattningsformuläret MADRS-S att det fanns signifikanta skillnader mellan den kliniska och den icke-kliniska gruppen där den kliniska gruppen skattade högre grad av pessimism och sömnsvårigheter.än den icke-kliniska gruppen. Resultatet visade också att det fanns samband mellan kategorierna positiva och negativa adjektiv och faktorindelningen i Familjeklimat.
Undersökningen väckte frågan om det möjligt att kategorierna positiva och negativa adjektiv skulle kunna komplettera faktorindelning i Familjeklimat. (Less) - Abstract
- This research is based on two surveys, Study 1 and Study 2. The purpose of Study 1 was to find out how staff within municipal individual and family social service and private care groups valued adjectives in the Family Climate self-rating scale (Familjeklimat) and if they were perceived as positive, neutral or negative. In Study 2, consisting of a clinical and a non-clinical group, it was examined whether there is an association with Family Climate self-rating scale and the adjectives valued at the highest consensus in Study 1.
Data collection was done through questionnaires that were converted to quantifiable data. Relationships between different variables and any connections for further analysis was reviewed.
The result in Study 1... (More) - This research is based on two surveys, Study 1 and Study 2. The purpose of Study 1 was to find out how staff within municipal individual and family social service and private care groups valued adjectives in the Family Climate self-rating scale (Familjeklimat) and if they were perceived as positive, neutral or negative. In Study 2, consisting of a clinical and a non-clinical group, it was examined whether there is an association with Family Climate self-rating scale and the adjectives valued at the highest consensus in Study 1.
Data collection was done through questionnaires that were converted to quantifiable data. Relationships between different variables and any connections for further analysis was reviewed.
The result in Study 1 showed that there was a very high consensus among respondents when they assessed adjectives within the categories positive and negative. The category of neutral adjectives was excluded as it did not achieve a sufficiently high consensus. The result in Study 2 showed that the research group as a whole endorsed the positive adjectives to a very large extent and the negative adjectives to a much lesser extent. Regarding differences between the clinical and non-clinical groups, they were mainly reflected in the specific positive words being endorsed, and that the clinical group endorsed negative adjectives to a greater extent. Furthermore, results from the self-assessment form MADRS-S revealed significant differences between the clinical and non-clinical groups in which the clinical group estimated higher pessimism and sleep difficulties compared to the non-clinical group.
The result also showed that there was a correlation between the categories positive and negative adjectives and the different factors in the Family Climate self-rating scale.
This raised the question whether the categories of positive and negative adjectives could complement Family Climate factors. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8943184
- author
- Friberg, Kajsa LU and Reiderstad, Flemming LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- PPTR06 20181
- year
- 2018
- type
- H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
- subject
- keywords
- Familjeklimat, Familjedimensioner, Familjediagnostik, Familjevariabel, Family Climate, Family Dimensions, Family Diagnostics, Family Variable
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 8943184
- date added to LUP
- 2018-05-31 09:15:25
- date last changed
- 2018-05-31 09:15:25
@misc{8943184,
abstract = {{This research is based on two surveys, Study 1 and Study 2. The purpose of Study 1 was to find out how staff within municipal individual and family social service and private care groups valued adjectives in the Family Climate self-rating scale (Familjeklimat) and if they were perceived as positive, neutral or negative. In Study 2, consisting of a clinical and a non-clinical group, it was examined whether there is an association with Family Climate self-rating scale and the adjectives valued at the highest consensus in Study 1.
Data collection was done through questionnaires that were converted to quantifiable data. Relationships between different variables and any connections for further analysis was reviewed.
The result in Study 1 showed that there was a very high consensus among respondents when they assessed adjectives within the categories positive and negative. The category of neutral adjectives was excluded as it did not achieve a sufficiently high consensus. The result in Study 2 showed that the research group as a whole endorsed the positive adjectives to a very large extent and the negative adjectives to a much lesser extent. Regarding differences between the clinical and non-clinical groups, they were mainly reflected in the specific positive words being endorsed, and that the clinical group endorsed negative adjectives to a greater extent. Furthermore, results from the self-assessment form MADRS-S revealed significant differences between the clinical and non-clinical groups in which the clinical group estimated higher pessimism and sleep difficulties compared to the non-clinical group.
The result also showed that there was a correlation between the categories positive and negative adjectives and the different factors in the Family Climate self-rating scale.
This raised the question whether the categories of positive and negative adjectives could complement Family Climate factors.}},
author = {{Friberg, Kajsa and Reiderstad, Flemming}},
language = {{swe}},
note = {{Student Paper}},
title = {{Vilka ord kan beskriva en familj? Ett sätt att fånga fler familjedimensioner.}},
year = {{2018}},
}