Biowaste Non-Sorters : who cares. Examining arguments and factors from citizens not sorting biowaste in Copenhagen and recommendations for a way forward
(2018) In Master Thesis Series in Environmental Studies and Sustainability Science MESM02 20181LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)
- Abstract
- The Danes’ have the highest municipal waste generation per capita in the European Union and it is
estimated that 40% of residual waste is biowaste. Fortunately, it is possible to address environmental
pressures and counteract resource loss from incineration by the process of bio-gasification of
collected biowaste in Denmark. However, despite efforts to reduce barriers of convenience and
accessibility in a newly implemented biowaste sorting scheme, 24% of Copenhageners do not sort
biowaste. This study aimed to examine influences contributing to and/or reinforcing non-sorting
practices and therefore asked: what influences people to not sort biowaste in Copenhagen?
Studies provide limited evidence of socio-economic or demographic... (More) - The Danes’ have the highest municipal waste generation per capita in the European Union and it is
estimated that 40% of residual waste is biowaste. Fortunately, it is possible to address environmental
pressures and counteract resource loss from incineration by the process of bio-gasification of
collected biowaste in Denmark. However, despite efforts to reduce barriers of convenience and
accessibility in a newly implemented biowaste sorting scheme, 24% of Copenhageners do not sort
biowaste. This study aimed to examine influences contributing to and/or reinforcing non-sorting
practices and therefore asked: what influences people to not sort biowaste in Copenhagen?
Studies provide limited evidence of socio-economic or demographic characteristics for
(non)recyclers. Still, non-sorters tend to be portrayed, in Danish grey literature, as one group, the
“indifferent”, who are unwilling to sort. Therefore, limited in-depth knowledge exists about nonsorters
in Copenhagen. This study is based on a social-environmental problem-solving perspective,
and its findings support a solution-oriented way forward.
Interviews with 11 non-sorting households provided first-hand insight into what influences the
citizens. Findings across respondents showed that practical, societal and rational arguments, as well
as numerous distinctive factors, influenced their non-sorting practices. However, what influence
respondents not to sort are neither simple within individual households nor across. From this,
examining individual households’ most influential factors, findings showed factors relating to
practical arguments are most numerous, but suggest that factors related to societal and rational
arguments are highly influential when present, despite small in numbers. Further, five of the 11
households had previously sorted biowaste, but stopped, which supports studies suggesting that a
strict distinction of sorters and non-sorters is an erroneous dichotomy. Moreover, questions of scale
and fear of freeriding, challenges the positive biowaste-environment correlation found, which have
altruistic potential.
The findings suggest that seeing non-sorters homogenously gives an incomplete understanding, and
considering heterogeneity unravelled non-sorters who care, know and are willing to sort biowaste.
Thus interventions in line with the findings could push for more sorting, hence a list of
recommendations was created. Knowledge accumulated could benefit policy-makers and
stakeholders working within the field municipal waste management and resource recovery in
Copenhagen and similar cities. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8948324
- author
- Touveneau Petersen, Stephanie LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- MESM02 20181
- year
- 2018
- type
- H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
- subject
- keywords
- biowaste, recycling, waste hierarchy, municipal waste management, urban resource management, phosphorous recovery
- publication/series
- Master Thesis Series in Environmental Studies and Sustainability Science
- report number
- 2018:027
- language
- English
- id
- 8948324
- date added to LUP
- 2018-06-14 10:27:19
- date last changed
- 2018-06-14 10:27:19
@misc{8948324, abstract = {{The Danes’ have the highest municipal waste generation per capita in the European Union and it is estimated that 40% of residual waste is biowaste. Fortunately, it is possible to address environmental pressures and counteract resource loss from incineration by the process of bio-gasification of collected biowaste in Denmark. However, despite efforts to reduce barriers of convenience and accessibility in a newly implemented biowaste sorting scheme, 24% of Copenhageners do not sort biowaste. This study aimed to examine influences contributing to and/or reinforcing non-sorting practices and therefore asked: what influences people to not sort biowaste in Copenhagen? Studies provide limited evidence of socio-economic or demographic characteristics for (non)recyclers. Still, non-sorters tend to be portrayed, in Danish grey literature, as one group, the “indifferent”, who are unwilling to sort. Therefore, limited in-depth knowledge exists about nonsorters in Copenhagen. This study is based on a social-environmental problem-solving perspective, and its findings support a solution-oriented way forward. Interviews with 11 non-sorting households provided first-hand insight into what influences the citizens. Findings across respondents showed that practical, societal and rational arguments, as well as numerous distinctive factors, influenced their non-sorting practices. However, what influence respondents not to sort are neither simple within individual households nor across. From this, examining individual households’ most influential factors, findings showed factors relating to practical arguments are most numerous, but suggest that factors related to societal and rational arguments are highly influential when present, despite small in numbers. Further, five of the 11 households had previously sorted biowaste, but stopped, which supports studies suggesting that a strict distinction of sorters and non-sorters is an erroneous dichotomy. Moreover, questions of scale and fear of freeriding, challenges the positive biowaste-environment correlation found, which have altruistic potential. The findings suggest that seeing non-sorters homogenously gives an incomplete understanding, and considering heterogeneity unravelled non-sorters who care, know and are willing to sort biowaste. Thus interventions in line with the findings could push for more sorting, hence a list of recommendations was created. Knowledge accumulated could benefit policy-makers and stakeholders working within the field municipal waste management and resource recovery in Copenhagen and similar cities.}}, author = {{Touveneau Petersen, Stephanie}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, series = {{Master Thesis Series in Environmental Studies and Sustainability Science}}, title = {{Biowaste Non-Sorters : who cares. Examining arguments and factors from citizens not sorting biowaste in Copenhagen and recommendations for a way forward}}, year = {{2018}}, }