Advanced

"Är det värt det?" : En kvalitativ studie av hur myndighetsutövande socionomer resonerar kring att framföra kritik inom och/eller gentemot sin arbetsorganisation

Regnell, Emma LU (2018) SOPA63 20181
School of Social Work
Abstract
The aim with this study was to examine and analyze the ways social workers within exercise of authority reason about expressing critique within their workplace organisation. My method of choice was of qualitative nature, and I got my data through interviewing four social workers within exercise of authority. Three were interviewed face to face, whereas one was interviewed via Skype. I structured the data into three parts: ​the role as a social workers withinexerciseofauthority​,​theimpactofthecolleaguesa​nd​theimpactofthesupervisor​. The conclusion of this study was that when a social workers within exercise of authority is considering expressing critique to a colleague or a supervisor, he or she is affected by both promoting and... (More)
The aim with this study was to examine and analyze the ways social workers within exercise of authority reason about expressing critique within their workplace organisation. My method of choice was of qualitative nature, and I got my data through interviewing four social workers within exercise of authority. Three were interviewed face to face, whereas one was interviewed via Skype. I structured the data into three parts: ​the role as a social workers withinexerciseofauthority​,​theimpactofthecolleaguesa​nd​theimpactofthesupervisor​. The conclusion of this study was that when a social workers within exercise of authority is considering expressing critique to a colleague or a supervisor, he or she is affected by both promoting and inhibitory factors. This result is similar to previous studies, but the first of its kind examining this kind of professional group. It can therefore be considered ​to have contributed with new and useful research. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Regnell, Emma LU
supervisor
organization
course
SOPA63 20181
year
type
M2 - Bachelor Degree
subject
keywords
social work, workplace, critique, colleagues, supervisor, organizational theory, street-level bureaucracy, discretion
language
Swedish
id
8957451
date added to LUP
2018-08-31 11:08:47
date last changed
2019-01-11 12:49:15
@misc{8957451,
  abstract     = {The aim with this study was to examine and analyze the ways social workers within exercise of authority reason about expressing critique within their workplace organisation. My method of choice was of qualitative nature, and I got my data through interviewing four social workers within exercise of authority. Three were interviewed face to face, whereas one was interviewed via Skype. I structured the data into three parts: ​the role as a social workers withinexerciseofauthority​,​theimpactofthecolleaguesa​nd​theimpactofthesupervisor​. The conclusion of this study was that when a social workers within exercise of authority is considering expressing critique to a colleague or a supervisor, he or she is affected by both promoting and inhibitory factors. This result is similar to previous studies, but the first of its kind examining this kind of professional group. It can therefore be considered ​to have contributed with new and useful research.},
  author       = {Regnell, Emma},
  keyword      = {social work,workplace,critique,colleagues,supervisor,organizational theory,street-level bureaucracy,discretion},
  language     = {swe},
  note         = {Student Paper},
  title        = {"Är det värt det?" : En kvalitativ studie av hur myndighetsutövande socionomer resonerar kring att framföra kritik inom och/eller gentemot sin arbetsorganisation},
  year         = {2018},
}