Det nationella försvaret som försvann
(2019) STVU15 20191Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- Ever since the end of the Cold War, there has been a differentiated view of the need for a national defense between Sweden and Finland. During the 2000s, Finland has had a strong national defense in relation to its spruce counttries, while Sweden gradually phased out its national defense capabilities.
The purpose of this case study is to identify the reason why the two countries have distinguished themselves in the view of the need for a national defense. The study is carried out by analyzing the documentation issued by the Swedish and Finnish government using Allison´s and Zelikow´s analysis model taken from Essence of Decission.
The study shows that the reduction of the national defense capability of the two countries is logical and... (More) - Ever since the end of the Cold War, there has been a differentiated view of the need for a national defense between Sweden and Finland. During the 2000s, Finland has had a strong national defense in relation to its spruce counttries, while Sweden gradually phased out its national defense capabilities.
The purpose of this case study is to identify the reason why the two countries have distinguished themselves in the view of the need for a national defense. The study is carried out by analyzing the documentation issued by the Swedish and Finnish government using Allison´s and Zelikow´s analysis model taken from Essence of Decission.
The study shows that the reduction of the national defense capability of the two countries is logical and rational in relation to the prevaling threat scene at the time. The fact that the national defense capabilities of the countries differ in this respect is due to theire respective history. Finland´s experience during the Second World War has marked the view of the need for a strong Defense Force that has a preventive threshold effect. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8975069
- author
- Persson, Henrik LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- STVU15 20191
- year
- 2019
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- Sverige, Finland, nationellt försvar, säkerhetspolitik, Försvarsbeslut
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 8975069
- date added to LUP
- 2019-08-13 11:39:52
- date last changed
- 2019-08-13 11:39:52
@misc{8975069, abstract = {{Ever since the end of the Cold War, there has been a differentiated view of the need for a national defense between Sweden and Finland. During the 2000s, Finland has had a strong national defense in relation to its spruce counttries, while Sweden gradually phased out its national defense capabilities. The purpose of this case study is to identify the reason why the two countries have distinguished themselves in the view of the need for a national defense. The study is carried out by analyzing the documentation issued by the Swedish and Finnish government using Allison´s and Zelikow´s analysis model taken from Essence of Decission. The study shows that the reduction of the national defense capability of the two countries is logical and rational in relation to the prevaling threat scene at the time. The fact that the national defense capabilities of the countries differ in this respect is due to theire respective history. Finland´s experience during the Second World War has marked the view of the need for a strong Defense Force that has a preventive threshold effect.}}, author = {{Persson, Henrik}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Det nationella försvaret som försvann}}, year = {{2019}}, }