Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Normalitet i det goda samhället

Isberg, Sofie LU (2019) SOPA63 20191
School of Social Work
Abstract
The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of how experts and non-experts relate to prenatal diagnosis regarding normality and the idea of what makes a good society. The method chosen for this study was qualitative content analysis. The sample used for the study includes 38 debate articles brought from Swedish daily newspapers. The results show little distinction between experts and non-experts. Small differences are shown in their ways of expressing their opinions, but regarding normality and values of what makes a good society in relation to prenatal diagnosis, the content is similar between the two.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Isberg, Sofie LU
supervisor
organization
course
SOPA63 20191
year
type
M2 - Bachelor Degree
subject
keywords
Prenatal diagnosis, termination of pregnancy, debates, risk society, claims-making, normality.
language
Swedish
id
8980270
date added to LUP
2019-06-17 15:21:00
date last changed
2019-06-17 15:21:00
@misc{8980270,
  abstract     = {{The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of how experts and non-experts relate to prenatal diagnosis regarding normality and the idea of what makes a good society. The method chosen for this study was qualitative content analysis. The sample used for the study includes 38 debate articles brought from Swedish daily newspapers. The results show little distinction between experts and non-experts. Small differences are shown in their ways of expressing their opinions, but regarding normality and values of what makes a good society in relation to prenatal diagnosis, the content is similar between the two.}},
  author       = {{Isberg, Sofie}},
  language     = {{swe}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Normalitet i det goda samhället}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}