Arbetsgivarens rehabiliteringsskyldighet vid alkoholmissbruk jämfört med medicinskt missbruk - När finner vi grund för uppsägning på grund av sjukdom
(2021) HARH16 20202Department of Business Law
- Abstract
- This comparative essay analyzes if there are differences in an employer's
rehabilitation responsibility for an employee which has an alcohol abuse problem
compared with an employee which has a medical abuse problem. The essay touches
on several considerations between, among other things, termination and dismissal.
The essay then goes through some current legal cases to clarify whether there is any
difference in the employer's rehabilitation responsibility for employees with alcohol
abuse versus medical abuse. In order to be able to answer the question, the legal
dogmatic method will be used with analogy conclusions. This is based on the fact
that there are several judgments that deal with an employee with alcohol problems.
But... (More) - This comparative essay analyzes if there are differences in an employer's
rehabilitation responsibility for an employee which has an alcohol abuse problem
compared with an employee which has a medical abuse problem. The essay touches
on several considerations between, among other things, termination and dismissal.
The essay then goes through some current legal cases to clarify whether there is any
difference in the employer's rehabilitation responsibility for employees with alcohol
abuse versus medical abuse. In order to be able to answer the question, the legal
dogmatic method will be used with analogy conclusions. This is based on the fact
that there are several judgments that deal with an employee with alcohol problems.
But there is a lack of knowledge, judgments, precedent, and actions when it comes
to a worker with medical abuse.
This has meant that it is not possible to make a general conclusion on how to assess
these situations. Also it is not certain that the outcome would be equivalent in court
between the two different types of legal situations. Faced with this legal status, the
essay has taken the help of interpreting this question with an analogical method. (Less) - Abstract (Swedish)
- I denna komparativa uppsatsen analyseras ifall det finns skillnader på en
arbetsgivares rehabiliteringsansvar hos arbetstagare som har alkoholmissbruk
jämfört med arbetstagare som har medicinskt missbruk. Här kommer uppsatsen in
på ett flertal övervägningar mellan bland annat uppsägning och avsked. För att
sedan gå igenom några aktuella rättsfall för att tydliggöra om det finns någon
skillnad i arbetsgivarens rehabiliteringsansvar för arbetstagare med
alkoholmissbruk kontra medicinskt missbruk. För att kunna besvara
frågeställningen kommer rättsdogmatisk metod att användas men även
analogislut. Detta grundar sig i att det finns flertal domar som handlar om en
arbetstagare med alkoholproblem. Men det är stor brist på kunskap, domar... (More) - I denna komparativa uppsatsen analyseras ifall det finns skillnader på en
arbetsgivares rehabiliteringsansvar hos arbetstagare som har alkoholmissbruk
jämfört med arbetstagare som har medicinskt missbruk. Här kommer uppsatsen in
på ett flertal övervägningar mellan bland annat uppsägning och avsked. För att
sedan gå igenom några aktuella rättsfall för att tydliggöra om det finns någon
skillnad i arbetsgivarens rehabiliteringsansvar för arbetstagare med
alkoholmissbruk kontra medicinskt missbruk. För att kunna besvara
frågeställningen kommer rättsdogmatisk metod att användas men även
analogislut. Detta grundar sig i att det finns flertal domar som handlar om en
arbetstagare med alkoholproblem. Men det är stor brist på kunskap, domar och
förhållningsätt när det kommer till en arbetstagare med medicinskt missbruk.
Detta har gjort att man inte kan dra en generell slutsats till hur man ska se på dessa fall . Då det inte är säkert att en domstol skulle dra samma slutsats mellan dom olika rättsförhållandena. Därav har slutsatsen tagit hjälp av att tolka denna frågeställning
med analogisk metod. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9037367
- author
- Jonsson, Rebecca LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- HARH16 20202
- year
- 2021
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- alkoholmissbruk, medicinskt missbruk, rehabilitering
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 9037367
- date added to LUP
- 2021-02-03 07:49:45
- date last changed
- 2021-02-03 07:49:45
@misc{9037367, abstract = {{This comparative essay analyzes if there are differences in an employer's rehabilitation responsibility for an employee which has an alcohol abuse problem compared with an employee which has a medical abuse problem. The essay touches on several considerations between, among other things, termination and dismissal. The essay then goes through some current legal cases to clarify whether there is any difference in the employer's rehabilitation responsibility for employees with alcohol abuse versus medical abuse. In order to be able to answer the question, the legal dogmatic method will be used with analogy conclusions. This is based on the fact that there are several judgments that deal with an employee with alcohol problems. But there is a lack of knowledge, judgments, precedent, and actions when it comes to a worker with medical abuse. This has meant that it is not possible to make a general conclusion on how to assess these situations. Also it is not certain that the outcome would be equivalent in court between the two different types of legal situations. Faced with this legal status, the essay has taken the help of interpreting this question with an analogical method.}}, author = {{Jonsson, Rebecca}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Arbetsgivarens rehabiliteringsskyldighet vid alkoholmissbruk jämfört med medicinskt missbruk - När finner vi grund för uppsägning på grund av sjukdom}}, year = {{2021}}, }