Styrning inom primärvården; vad anser de sjukvårdsanställda?
(2021) STVK02 20211Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- This essay is a qualitative study of the Swedish primary care and covers the medical professions’ experiences and opinions about the organizational governance of health care. Eight semi structured interviews have been made with four doctors, two physiotherapists, one psychologist and one nurse. The interviews aimed for the respondents to talk about their experiences of governance and compensation models. The results concluded that the system has some shortages. Sometimes employees have incentives to maximize economic replacement instead of making the most effective decisions. There is also a lack of relevant ways to measure the qualities of health care. The discussion focus on how the governance can be improved, why there seems to be a... (More)
- This essay is a qualitative study of the Swedish primary care and covers the medical professions’ experiences and opinions about the organizational governance of health care. Eight semi structured interviews have been made with four doctors, two physiotherapists, one psychologist and one nurse. The interviews aimed for the respondents to talk about their experiences of governance and compensation models. The results concluded that the system has some shortages. Sometimes employees have incentives to maximize economic replacement instead of making the most effective decisions. There is also a lack of relevant ways to measure the qualities of health care. The discussion focus on how the governance can be improved, why there seems to be a difference between private and public health centers and why the compensation models sometimes give employees improper incentives to use the system. The conclusions suggest more flexibility in the compensation models as well as a higher degree of participation among primary care employees in the decision making in order to reach more effective governance. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9045097
- author
- Wihl, Johanna LU
- supervisor
- organization
- alternative title
- En kvalitativ undersökning av primärvårdsanställdas uppfattningar och åsikter kring styrningen av primärvården
- course
- STVK02 20211
- year
- 2021
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- Primärvård, New Public Management, styrningsmodell, vårdcentral, ersättningsmodell
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 9045097
- date added to LUP
- 2021-07-06 12:12:55
- date last changed
- 2021-07-06 12:12:55
@misc{9045097,
abstract = {{This essay is a qualitative study of the Swedish primary care and covers the medical professions’ experiences and opinions about the organizational governance of health care. Eight semi structured interviews have been made with four doctors, two physiotherapists, one psychologist and one nurse. The interviews aimed for the respondents to talk about their experiences of governance and compensation models. The results concluded that the system has some shortages. Sometimes employees have incentives to maximize economic replacement instead of making the most effective decisions. There is also a lack of relevant ways to measure the qualities of health care. The discussion focus on how the governance can be improved, why there seems to be a difference between private and public health centers and why the compensation models sometimes give employees improper incentives to use the system. The conclusions suggest more flexibility in the compensation models as well as a higher degree of participation among primary care employees in the decision making in order to reach more effective governance.}},
author = {{Wihl, Johanna}},
language = {{swe}},
note = {{Student Paper}},
title = {{Styrning inom primärvården; vad anser de sjukvårdsanställda?}},
year = {{2021}},
}