Is it Smart to be Climate-Smart? The Efficiency of Climate-Smart Agriculture in Tanzania
(2021) EKHS34 20211Department of Economic History
- Abstract
- Does it pay to adopt Climate-Smart Practices? Despite the general understanding that CSA practices or innovative land management methods increase farmers’ food security, the key to the current debate within the literature is to understand the extent to which CSA practices explain differences in farmers’ productivity and resilience to climatic shocks. To fill this gap, this study examines the variation in crop yields among Tanzanian farmers across three CSA practices: intercropping, inorganic fertilization, and improved seeding. By using panel data collected by the National Bureau of Statistics in Tanzania (NBS) between 2008-2011, a plot-level analysis concluded that intercropping and inorganic fertilization are positively associated with... (More)
- Does it pay to adopt Climate-Smart Practices? Despite the general understanding that CSA practices or innovative land management methods increase farmers’ food security, the key to the current debate within the literature is to understand the extent to which CSA practices explain differences in farmers’ productivity and resilience to climatic shocks. To fill this gap, this study examines the variation in crop yields among Tanzanian farmers across three CSA practices: intercropping, inorganic fertilization, and improved seeding. By using panel data collected by the National Bureau of Statistics in Tanzania (NBS) between 2008-2011, a plot-level analysis concluded that intercropping and inorganic fertilization are positively associated with increased productivity (kg/acre), increasing crop yields by 59 and 54 percent respectively. Climatic shocks, while reducing productivity across all plots, were less damaging in plots where intercropping and inorganic fertilization occurred. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9055012
- author
- Ekman, Beata LU
- supervisor
-
- Igor Martins LU
- organization
- course
- EKHS34 20211
- year
- 2021
- type
- H1 - Master's Degree (One Year)
- subject
- keywords
- Climatic shocks, Climate-Smart Agriculture, Crop Productivity, Tanzania
- language
- English
- id
- 9055012
- date added to LUP
- 2021-06-24 13:18:11
- date last changed
- 2021-08-04 08:49:23
@misc{9055012, abstract = {{Does it pay to adopt Climate-Smart Practices? Despite the general understanding that CSA practices or innovative land management methods increase farmers’ food security, the key to the current debate within the literature is to understand the extent to which CSA practices explain differences in farmers’ productivity and resilience to climatic shocks. To fill this gap, this study examines the variation in crop yields among Tanzanian farmers across three CSA practices: intercropping, inorganic fertilization, and improved seeding. By using panel data collected by the National Bureau of Statistics in Tanzania (NBS) between 2008-2011, a plot-level analysis concluded that intercropping and inorganic fertilization are positively associated with increased productivity (kg/acre), increasing crop yields by 59 and 54 percent respectively. Climatic shocks, while reducing productivity across all plots, were less damaging in plots where intercropping and inorganic fertilization occurred.}}, author = {{Ekman, Beata}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Is it Smart to be Climate-Smart? The Efficiency of Climate-Smart Agriculture in Tanzania}}, year = {{2021}}, }