Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Olaga Våldsskildring - Vem skyddas och vem är skyddsvärd?

Taranger Bergljung, Susanna LU (2021) LAGF03 20212
Department of Law
Faculty of Law
Abstract (Swedish)
Syftet med denna studie var att analysera och utvärdera den svenska straffrättsliga regleringen kring olaga våldsskildring. Fokus var specifikt att undersöka hur material sprids, och vem eller vad skyddsintresset är, för att sedan jämföra detta med syftet med andra lagar om brottslig integritetskränkning, specifikt barnpornografibrott, kränkande fotografering och olaga integritetsintrång.
Det finns inte mycket forskning om brottet, vilket gör det till ett relevant ämne att utvärdera. Regelverkets rättsliga ramar härstammar från 80-talet och redan då var forskningsresultaten om det specifika skyddsintresset för olaga våldsskildringar oklara. Utöver detta var tyngdpunkten i regelverket att skydda mot fiktiva skildringar av våld och material... (More)
Syftet med denna studie var att analysera och utvärdera den svenska straffrättsliga regleringen kring olaga våldsskildring. Fokus var specifikt att undersöka hur material sprids, och vem eller vad skyddsintresset är, för att sedan jämföra detta med syftet med andra lagar om brottslig integritetskränkning, specifikt barnpornografibrott, kränkande fotografering och olaga integritetsintrång.
Det finns inte mycket forskning om brottet, vilket gör det till ett relevant ämne att utvärdera. Regelverkets rättsliga ramar härstammar från 80-talet och redan då var forskningsresultaten om det specifika skyddsintresset för olaga våldsskildringar oklara. Utöver detta var tyngdpunkten i regelverket att skydda mot fiktiva skildringar av våld och material innehållande sexuellt tvång.
Metoden för denna studie var rättsdogmatisk metod, och bestod i att undersöka den specifika lagen, rättsfall, doktrin och lagstiftningsarbetet.
Sammanfattningsvis är det tydligt att andra strafflagar som liknar olaga våldsskildring har ett skyddsintresse som är väldigt annorlunda. Dessutom finns det en risk att individer som har blivit utsatta för våld och fått filmer som skildrar det delade, men som inte kan ta hand om sina rättsliga intressen på grund av yttre omständigheter, inte får något skydd för sin integritet när det gäller det spridda materialet.
Spridningen av materialet skiljer sig idag klart från tiden då det grundläggande lagstiftningsarbetet gjordes. Bestämmelserna uppkom när den normala spridningen av videor relevanta för brottet skedde via videoband och idag sker spridning främst via internet på både clearnet och darknet. Materialet i de relevanta fall som rapporterats är dessutom nästan uteslutande skildringar av verkligt våld och sexuella övergrepp, vilket inte beaktades under lagstiftningsprocessen. (Less)
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze and evaluate the Swedish criminal law regulation regarding spreading illegal depictions of violence. A focus was specifically to research how material is spread, and who or what the interest of protection is and to compare this to the interest of other laws concerning criminal invasion on integrity, specifically child pornography crimes, illegal photography and unlawful invasion of privacy.
There isn’t much research done on this specific crime, which makes it a relevant subject to evaluate. Legal framework of the regulations originates from the 80’s and even then the research results on the specific interest of protection in regards to illegal depictions of violence were unclear. In addition to... (More)
The purpose of this study was to analyze and evaluate the Swedish criminal law regulation regarding spreading illegal depictions of violence. A focus was specifically to research how material is spread, and who or what the interest of protection is and to compare this to the interest of other laws concerning criminal invasion on integrity, specifically child pornography crimes, illegal photography and unlawful invasion of privacy.
There isn’t much research done on this specific crime, which makes it a relevant subject to evaluate. Legal framework of the regulations originates from the 80’s and even then the research results on the specific interest of protection in regards to illegal depictions of violence were unclear. In addition to this the focus of the regulations was to protect from fictional depictions of violence and forceful sexual material.
The method for this study was a legal dogmatic method, and consisted of researching the specific law, cases, doctrine and legislative work.
In conclusion compared to other criminal laws that are similar, this law has a protectional interest that is vastly different. Furthermore, there is a possibility that individuals who have been subjected to violence and have gotten videos spread depicting it but can’t take care of their legal interests because of external circumstances, receive no protection for their integrity in regards to the shared content.
The spread of material is clearly different from when the legislative framework for the law was done. The regulations came upon when the normal spread of videos was through video-tapes and today most media regarding the crime concerns spreading through the internet on both the Clearnet and darknet. Moreover, the material in relevant cases reported is almost exclusively depictions of real violence and sexual abuse which was not considered during the legislation process. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Taranger Bergljung, Susanna LU
supervisor
organization
course
LAGF03 20212
year
type
M2 - Bachelor Degree
subject
keywords
allmän rättslära, straffrätt, rättsvetenskap, barnpornografibrott, Integritetskränkning, utvärdering, Olaga våldsskildring
language
Swedish
id
9069612
date added to LUP
2022-02-15 11:49:56
date last changed
2022-02-15 11:49:56
@misc{9069612,
  abstract     = {{The purpose of this study was to analyze and evaluate the Swedish criminal law regulation regarding spreading illegal depictions of violence. A focus was specifically to research how material is spread, and who or what the interest of protection is and to compare this to the interest of other laws concerning criminal invasion on integrity, specifically child pornography crimes, illegal photography and unlawful invasion of privacy.
	There isn’t much research done on this specific crime, which makes it a relevant subject to evaluate. Legal framework of the regulations originates from the 80’s and even then the research results on the specific interest of protection in regards to illegal depictions of violence were unclear. In addition to this the focus of the regulations was to protect from fictional depictions of violence and forceful sexual material.
	The method for this study was a legal dogmatic method, and consisted of researching the specific law, cases, doctrine and legislative work. 
	In conclusion compared to other criminal laws that are similar, this law has a protectional interest that is vastly different. Furthermore, there is a possibility that individuals who have been subjected to violence and have gotten videos spread depicting it but can’t take care of their legal interests because of external circumstances, receive no protection for their integrity in regards to the shared content.
	The spread of material is clearly different from when the legislative framework for the law was done. The regulations came upon when the normal spread of videos was through video-tapes and today most media regarding the crime concerns spreading through the internet on both the Clearnet and darknet. Moreover, the material in relevant cases reported is almost exclusively depictions of real violence and sexual abuse which was not considered during the legislation process.}},
  author       = {{Taranger Bergljung, Susanna}},
  language     = {{swe}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Olaga Våldsskildring - Vem skyddas och vem är skyddsvärd?}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}