Misslyckade upphandlingar och hur de kan undvikas - En studie av hur myndigheter och lagstiftaren kan förbättra upphandlingar
(2021) LAGF03 20212Department of Law
Faculty of Law
- Abstract
- The purpose of this thesis is to study how authorities and legislators can act to avoid failed public procurements. This is achieved by studying the current regulation and two public procurements that are regarded as failed public procurements by the media. Firstly, an account of current regulations for public procurement is made. Particular attention is paid to that neither preparation of procurement nor follow-up of procurement is demanded. Secondly, the essay studies the public procurement of third-party logistics between VFN and the supplier Apotekstjänst and the procurement of data collection between SCB and Evry. The examination of the public procurements includes reports of the deficiencies of the procurements. The reports show that... (More)
- The purpose of this thesis is to study how authorities and legislators can act to avoid failed public procurements. This is achieved by studying the current regulation and two public procurements that are regarded as failed public procurements by the media. Firstly, an account of current regulations for public procurement is made. Particular attention is paid to that neither preparation of procurement nor follow-up of procurement is demanded. Secondly, the essay studies the public procurement of third-party logistics between VFN and the supplier Apotekstjänst and the procurement of data collection between SCB and Evry. The examination of the public procurements includes reports of the deficiencies of the procurements. The reports show that the procurements failed due to shortcomings in preparation of the procurement, choice of evaluation basis and follow-up of the procurement.
Thirdly, the essay consists of an analysis and a conclusion. The analysis begins with a discussion of what measures authorities can take to avoid failed public procurements. Authorities should
acquire knowledge of the market, perform sufficient risk analyzes, use the evaluation basis best relationship between price and quality and follow-up of the procurement. The second part of the analysis studies how legislators can prevent failed procurements. It is proposed that the legislators introduce requirements for risk analyzes and cooperation with the intended recipient of the object of the procurement. In addition, it suggests that the evaluation basis the best relationship between price and quality should be the main rule for public procurement and that the law should require follow-up of the procurement. The essay ends with a conclusion based on the analysis. (Less) - Abstract (Swedish)
- Uppsatsens syfte är att studera hur myndigheter och lagstiftaren kan agera för att undvika misslyckade upphandlingar. Det uppnås genom att studera det nuvarande regelverket i LOU och två upphandlingar som uppmärksammats medialt som misslyckade upphandlingar. Inledningsvis studeras LOU och det påpekas särskilt att varken förberedelse eller uppföljning av upphandling omfattas av regelverket. Därefter granskas upphandling av tredjepartslogistik mellan Varuförsörjningsnämnden och leverantören Apotekstjänst samt upphandling av datainsamling mellan SCB och Evry. Granskningen av upphandlingarna innefattar rapporter som diskuterar upphandlingarnas brister. Rapporterna visar att upphandlingarna misslyckades på grund av brister i förberedelse av... (More)
- Uppsatsens syfte är att studera hur myndigheter och lagstiftaren kan agera för att undvika misslyckade upphandlingar. Det uppnås genom att studera det nuvarande regelverket i LOU och två upphandlingar som uppmärksammats medialt som misslyckade upphandlingar. Inledningsvis studeras LOU och det påpekas särskilt att varken förberedelse eller uppföljning av upphandling omfattas av regelverket. Därefter granskas upphandling av tredjepartslogistik mellan Varuförsörjningsnämnden och leverantören Apotekstjänst samt upphandling av datainsamling mellan SCB och Evry. Granskningen av upphandlingarna innefattar rapporter som diskuterar upphandlingarnas brister. Rapporterna visar att upphandlingarna misslyckades på grund av brister i förberedelse av upphandling, utvärderingsgrunden pris och uppföljning av upphandling.
Analysen inleds sedan med en granskning av vilka åtgärder myndigheter kan vidta för att undvika misslyckade upphandlingar. Faktorer som kunskap om marknaden, tillräckliga riskanalyser, utvärderingsgrunden bästa förhållande mellan pris och kvalitet och noga uppföljning av upphandlingen identifieras som framgångsfaktorer. Analysens andra del studerar vilka möjligheter lagstiftaren har att förhindra misslyckade upphandlingar. Det föreslås införas krav på riskanalyser och samarbete med slutkunden. Därutöver föreslås det att utvärderingsgrunden bästa förhållande mellan pris och kvalitet ska vara huvudregeln vid upphandling enligt LOU och att lagen ska kräva uppföljning av upphandling. Uppsatsen avslutas med en slutsats baserad på analysen. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9070146
- author
- Sundewall, Tilda LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- LAGF03 20212
- year
- 2021
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- avtalsrätt
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 9070146
- date added to LUP
- 2022-02-15 11:48:46
- date last changed
- 2022-02-15 11:48:46
@misc{9070146, abstract = {{The purpose of this thesis is to study how authorities and legislators can act to avoid failed public procurements. This is achieved by studying the current regulation and two public procurements that are regarded as failed public procurements by the media. Firstly, an account of current regulations for public procurement is made. Particular attention is paid to that neither preparation of procurement nor follow-up of procurement is demanded. Secondly, the essay studies the public procurement of third-party logistics between VFN and the supplier Apotekstjänst and the procurement of data collection between SCB and Evry. The examination of the public procurements includes reports of the deficiencies of the procurements. The reports show that the procurements failed due to shortcomings in preparation of the procurement, choice of evaluation basis and follow-up of the procurement. Thirdly, the essay consists of an analysis and a conclusion. The analysis begins with a discussion of what measures authorities can take to avoid failed public procurements. Authorities should acquire knowledge of the market, perform sufficient risk analyzes, use the evaluation basis best relationship between price and quality and follow-up of the procurement. The second part of the analysis studies how legislators can prevent failed procurements. It is proposed that the legislators introduce requirements for risk analyzes and cooperation with the intended recipient of the object of the procurement. In addition, it suggests that the evaluation basis the best relationship between price and quality should be the main rule for public procurement and that the law should require follow-up of the procurement. The essay ends with a conclusion based on the analysis.}}, author = {{Sundewall, Tilda}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Misslyckade upphandlingar och hur de kan undvikas - En studie av hur myndigheter och lagstiftaren kan förbättra upphandlingar}}, year = {{2021}}, }