Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The Duck-Rabbit Ambiguity of Evaluations: A Comparative Study of How Evaluative Ideals Are Discursively Constructed and Affect Evaluative Judgments

Tilly, Alfred LU (2022) WPMM43 20221
Department of Political Science
Abstract
Evaluative practices play an increasingly important role in the management of local government. More than ever, evaluations are seen as a means for stakeholders to garner objective information about the performance of public organizations in order to demand accountability. However, this understanding of evaluative judgments as objective is being challenged by constructivist scholars. They argue that evaluations are performative, meaning creating activities whose results hinge on normative and prescriptive understandings of what evaluations should focus on and what an ideal organization should look like. In Sweden, municipal audit boards represent one of the most important evaluative actors but have rarely been examined from a critical... (More)
Evaluative practices play an increasingly important role in the management of local government. More than ever, evaluations are seen as a means for stakeholders to garner objective information about the performance of public organizations in order to demand accountability. However, this understanding of evaluative judgments as objective is being challenged by constructivist scholars. They argue that evaluations are performative, meaning creating activities whose results hinge on normative and prescriptive understandings of what evaluations should focus on and what an ideal organization should look like. In Sweden, municipal audit boards represent one of the most important evaluative actors but have rarely been examined from a critical perspective. This paper investigates in what way evaluative ideals, through discourse practice, might affect evaluative judgments. A most similar systems case selection design is used to highlight the potential effect of evaluative ideals on evaluative judgments. Results show an overarching discursive theme of depoliticization as well as a dominance of rational ideals in the two municipal audit boards studied, with the audit board that made less critical evaluative judgments following the rational ideal slightly less in favor of a learning ideal. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Tilly, Alfred LU
supervisor
organization
course
WPMM43 20221
year
type
H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
subject
keywords
critical discourse analysis, municipal auditing, evaluation, evaluative ideals, evaluation use
language
English
id
9080052
date added to LUP
2022-07-03 09:04:46
date last changed
2022-07-03 09:04:46
@misc{9080052,
  abstract     = {{Evaluative practices play an increasingly important role in the management of local government. More than ever, evaluations are seen as a means for stakeholders to garner objective information about the performance of public organizations in order to demand accountability. However, this understanding of evaluative judgments as objective is being challenged by constructivist scholars. They argue that evaluations are performative, meaning creating activities whose results hinge on normative and prescriptive understandings of what evaluations should focus on and what an ideal organization should look like. In Sweden, municipal audit boards represent one of the most important evaluative actors but have rarely been examined from a critical perspective. This paper investigates in what way evaluative ideals, through discourse practice, might affect evaluative judgments. A most similar systems case selection design is used to highlight the potential effect of evaluative ideals on evaluative judgments. Results show an overarching discursive theme of depoliticization as well as a dominance of rational ideals in the two municipal audit boards studied, with the audit board that made less critical evaluative judgments following the rational ideal slightly less in favor of a learning ideal.}},
  author       = {{Tilly, Alfred}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{The Duck-Rabbit Ambiguity of Evaluations: A Comparative Study of How Evaluative Ideals Are Discursively Constructed and Affect Evaluative Judgments}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}