Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

If this is a genocide: A critical discourse analysis of opening addresses at the Israeli Holocaust Remembrance Day 2014-2021

Lindgren, Gabriel LU (2022) STVM25 20221
Department of Political Science
Abstract
The purpose of this thesis is to contribute to the discussion on the relation between memory and security in how Holocaust remembrance discourse affect the construction of security in Israel. By utilizing Norman Fairclough’s method of textual and discursive practice it analyzes speeches held by Israeli heads of state at the opening ceremony of Holocaust Remembrance Day between the years 2014-2021. Securitization theory is applied from a mnemonical perspective in order to explain how security, discursive production and identities are constructed. The speeches are analyzed with focus on how their lexico-grammatical composition and interdiscursivity promote a certain view of how to understand the present through imaginaries of the past. The... (More)
The purpose of this thesis is to contribute to the discussion on the relation between memory and security in how Holocaust remembrance discourse affect the construction of security in Israel. By utilizing Norman Fairclough’s method of textual and discursive practice it analyzes speeches held by Israeli heads of state at the opening ceremony of Holocaust Remembrance Day between the years 2014-2021. Securitization theory is applied from a mnemonical perspective in order to explain how security, discursive production and identities are constructed. The speeches are analyzed with focus on how their lexico-grammatical composition and interdiscursivity promote a certain view of how to understand the present through imaginaries of the past. The results indicate that the linguistics and discursive practice of remembrance discourses reproduce a view of social reality in which the Holocaust creates meaning to security through depictions of existential survival and historical duty. A securitized meaning conditioned by the depoliticization of Holocaust-prevention and the creation of antagonistic social identities. Lastly, the thesis argues that Holocaust in contemporary Israeli remembrance discourse functions as a securitizing template for Jewish life. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Lindgren, Gabriel LU
supervisor
organization
course
STVM25 20221
year
type
H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
subject
keywords
Israel, Holocaust, remembrance, security, discourse
language
English
id
9080196
date added to LUP
2022-07-03 09:01:26
date last changed
2022-07-03 09:01:26
@misc{9080196,
  abstract     = {{The purpose of this thesis is to contribute to the discussion on the relation between memory and security in how Holocaust remembrance discourse affect the construction of security in Israel. By utilizing Norman Fairclough’s method of textual and discursive practice it analyzes speeches held by Israeli heads of state at the opening ceremony of Holocaust Remembrance Day between the years 2014-2021. Securitization theory is applied from a mnemonical perspective in order to explain how security, discursive production and identities are constructed. The speeches are analyzed with focus on how their lexico-grammatical composition and interdiscursivity promote a certain view of how to understand the present through imaginaries of the past. The results indicate that the linguistics and discursive practice of remembrance discourses reproduce a view of social reality in which the Holocaust creates meaning to security through depictions of existential survival and historical duty. A securitized meaning conditioned by the depoliticization of Holocaust-prevention and the creation of antagonistic social identities. Lastly, the thesis argues that Holocaust in contemporary Israeli remembrance discourse functions as a securitizing template for Jewish life.}},
  author       = {{Lindgren, Gabriel}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{If this is a genocide: A critical discourse analysis of opening addresses at the Israeli Holocaust Remembrance Day 2014-2021}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}