Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Att vinna ett fält utan strid - Om jurisdiktionsarbete kring och inom det stödjande samtalet och dess betydelse för hälso- och sjukvårdskuratorns professionella identitet

Gustafsson Fagerlind, Sofia LU (2022) SAHS05 20221
School of Social Work
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine health care social workers’ and psychologists' perception of counseling (stödsamtal), how jurisdictional work can be seen within counseling and what significance the jurisdictional work has for the health care social worker’s professional identity. The method chosen was semi-structured interviews with four health care social workers and four psychologists, all operating within child habilitation in Skåne, Sweden. Both professions are responsible for parental support and counseling. The study has its basis in professional theories. Concepts such as professionalism, experience-based knowledge, jurisdiction and professional identity have been used to analyze the collected empirical data. The result shows... (More)
The aim of this study was to examine health care social workers’ and psychologists' perception of counseling (stödsamtal), how jurisdictional work can be seen within counseling and what significance the jurisdictional work has for the health care social worker’s professional identity. The method chosen was semi-structured interviews with four health care social workers and four psychologists, all operating within child habilitation in Skåne, Sweden. Both professions are responsible for parental support and counseling. The study has its basis in professional theories. Concepts such as professionalism, experience-based knowledge, jurisdiction and professional identity have been used to analyze the collected empirical data. The result shows that both professions find counseling as a broad, and sometimes ambiguous, task that consists of a mix of theories and methods. Psychologists seem to use a more theoretical based knowledge, while health care social workers rather base their counseling on experience-based knowledge. The professionals agree on that in counseling, relationship is more important than method. In comparison to previous research there is no border dispute between the health care social workers and the psychologists regarding the parental counseling, they complete rather than compete. Even so, the health care social worker can be interpreted to win the field of parental counseling due to their practical, and societal, knowledge, but without a battle. Within the jurisdictional work the health care social worker is seen as broad, personal, and accessible. Though, when assigning a case to someone, the choice is more often based on a person with a certain experience rather than profession. The big culprit pointed out by the professionals is lack of time, which is seen as the biggest obstacle for cooperation and professional practice. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Gustafsson Fagerlind, Sofia LU
supervisor
organization
course
SAHS05 20221
year
type
H3 - Professional qualifications (4 Years - )
subject
keywords
Counseling, jurisdiction, professional identity, health care social worker, psychologist
language
Swedish
id
9083840
date added to LUP
2022-06-14 09:04:04
date last changed
2022-06-14 09:04:04
@misc{9083840,
  abstract     = {{The aim of this study was to examine health care social workers’ and psychologists' perception of counseling (stödsamtal), how jurisdictional work can be seen within counseling and what significance the jurisdictional work has for the health care social worker’s professional identity. The method chosen was semi-structured interviews with four health care social workers and four psychologists, all operating within child habilitation in Skåne, Sweden. Both professions are responsible for parental support and counseling. The study has its basis in professional theories. Concepts such as professionalism, experience-based knowledge, jurisdiction and professional identity have been used to analyze the collected empirical data. The result shows that both professions find counseling as a broad, and sometimes ambiguous, task that consists of a mix of theories and methods. Psychologists seem to use a more theoretical based knowledge, while health care social workers rather base their counseling on experience-based knowledge. The professionals agree on that in counseling, relationship is more important than method. In comparison to previous research there is no border dispute between the health care social workers and the psychologists regarding the parental counseling, they complete rather than compete. Even so, the health care social worker can be interpreted to win the field of parental counseling due to their practical, and societal, knowledge, but without a battle. Within the jurisdictional work the health care social worker is seen as broad, personal, and accessible. Though, when assigning a case to someone, the choice is more often based on a person with a certain experience rather than profession. The big culprit pointed out by the professionals is lack of time, which is seen as the biggest obstacle for cooperation and professional practice.}},
  author       = {{Gustafsson Fagerlind, Sofia}},
  language     = {{swe}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Att vinna ett fält utan strid - Om jurisdiktionsarbete kring och inom det stödjande samtalet och dess betydelse för hälso- och sjukvårdskuratorns professionella identitet}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}