Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The FIFA and UEFA prior authorisation rules and the European Super League in light of competition law: A red card?

Westenend, Fleur Louise LU (2022) JAEM03 20221
Department of Law
Faculty of Law
Abstract
This thesis scrutinises the concept of the European Super League in light of EU competition law and aims to provide an answer to the question whether the rules on prior authorisation by FIFA and UEFA infringe Article 101 and/or Article 102 TFEU, and whether the European Super League itself infringes Article 101 TFEU. The outcome of this thesis is that both questions must be answered in the affirmative.

FIFA’s and UEFA’s rules on prior authorisation amount to a restriction of competition by object under Article 101(1) TFEU and abuse of a dominant position under Article 102 TFEU, as the rules restrict market access. Moreover, the rules are disproportionate, seeing that they do not set out any criteria regarding the approval of prior... (More)
This thesis scrutinises the concept of the European Super League in light of EU competition law and aims to provide an answer to the question whether the rules on prior authorisation by FIFA and UEFA infringe Article 101 and/or Article 102 TFEU, and whether the European Super League itself infringes Article 101 TFEU. The outcome of this thesis is that both questions must be answered in the affirmative.

FIFA’s and UEFA’s rules on prior authorisation amount to a restriction of competition by object under Article 101(1) TFEU and abuse of a dominant position under Article 102 TFEU, as the rules restrict market access. Moreover, the rules are disproportionate, seeing that they do not set out any criteria regarding the approval of prior authorisation requests and are not subject to restrictions, obligations and review.

Would the European Super League be executed in the way it was announced in 2021, it would restrict competition by effect under Article 101 TFEU as it would allow the founding clubs to increase their market power. The European Super League agreement cannot be justified as it is disproportionate and could damage the competitive structure of the market. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Westenend, Fleur Louise LU
supervisor
organization
course
JAEM03 20221
year
type
H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
subject
keywords
Competition law Super League FIFA UEFA Breakaway League
language
English
id
9086304
date added to LUP
2022-06-15 11:18:27
date last changed
2022-06-15 11:18:27
@misc{9086304,
  abstract     = {{This thesis scrutinises the concept of the European Super League in light of EU competition law and aims to provide an answer to the question whether the rules on prior authorisation by FIFA and UEFA infringe Article 101 and/or Article 102 TFEU, and whether the European Super League itself infringes Article 101 TFEU. The outcome of this thesis is that both questions must be answered in the affirmative.

FIFA’s and UEFA’s rules on prior authorisation amount to a restriction of competition by object under Article 101(1) TFEU and abuse of a dominant position under Article 102 TFEU, as the rules restrict market access. Moreover, the rules are disproportionate, seeing that they do not set out any criteria regarding the approval of prior authorisation requests and are not subject to restrictions, obligations and review.

Would the European Super League be executed in the way it was announced in 2021, it would restrict competition by effect under Article 101 TFEU as it would allow the founding clubs to increase their market power. The European Super League agreement cannot be justified as it is disproportionate and could damage the competitive structure of the market.}},
  author       = {{Westenend, Fleur Louise}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{The FIFA and UEFA prior authorisation rules and the European Super League in light of competition law: A red card?}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}