(Re-)Framed: Controlling vs. Transforming - Understanding varying social policy crisis responses when comparing the Commision's policy framing during both the pandemic and the Euro crisis
(2022) STVM23 20221Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- Both the pandemic and Euro crisis posed social risks in terms of unemployment and poverty. Yet, we see a more socially focussed crisis response to the pandemic, whereas the Euro crisis mainly neglected social policy. My thesis asks in how far such social policy crisis response variation can be understood. Hitherto literature usually focusses on instiutionalist arguments that are unable to bridge structure and agency. In line with a few researchers, assuming that communicative aspects played a major role for variation, I conduct two framing analyses of the Commission’s communication, one for each crisis, since the Commission is the formal agenda-setter of the EU. I find that both Commission’s framings mirrow the policy responses, thereby... (More)
- Both the pandemic and Euro crisis posed social risks in terms of unemployment and poverty. Yet, we see a more socially focussed crisis response to the pandemic, whereas the Euro crisis mainly neglected social policy. My thesis asks in how far such social policy crisis response variation can be understood. Hitherto literature usually focusses on instiutionalist arguments that are unable to bridge structure and agency. In line with a few researchers, assuming that communicative aspects played a major role for variation, I conduct two framing analyses of the Commission’s communication, one for each crisis, since the Commission is the formal agenda-setter of the EU. I find that both Commission’s framings mirrow the policy responses, thereby connecting hitherto structural arguments with agency. Although no direct causality is claimed, my framing analyses offer an understanding on how a political actor, such as the Commission influences EU policy-making by actively seeking to conceptualize events according to their own policy preferences, thereby translating externalities such as crises and structures into political action. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9097355
- author
- Meschke, Denise LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- STVM23 20221
- year
- 2022
- type
- H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
- subject
- keywords
- crisis, crisis response, social policy, economic policy, framing
- language
- English
- id
- 9097355
- date added to LUP
- 2022-10-04 13:13:51
- date last changed
- 2022-10-04 13:13:51
@misc{9097355, abstract = {{Both the pandemic and Euro crisis posed social risks in terms of unemployment and poverty. Yet, we see a more socially focussed crisis response to the pandemic, whereas the Euro crisis mainly neglected social policy. My thesis asks in how far such social policy crisis response variation can be understood. Hitherto literature usually focusses on instiutionalist arguments that are unable to bridge structure and agency. In line with a few researchers, assuming that communicative aspects played a major role for variation, I conduct two framing analyses of the Commission’s communication, one for each crisis, since the Commission is the formal agenda-setter of the EU. I find that both Commission’s framings mirrow the policy responses, thereby connecting hitherto structural arguments with agency. Although no direct causality is claimed, my framing analyses offer an understanding on how a political actor, such as the Commission influences EU policy-making by actively seeking to conceptualize events according to their own policy preferences, thereby translating externalities such as crises and structures into political action.}}, author = {{Meschke, Denise}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{(Re-)Framed: Controlling vs. Transforming - Understanding varying social policy crisis responses when comparing the Commision's policy framing during both the pandemic and the Euro crisis}}, year = {{2022}}, }