Komparativ diskursanalys av Donald Trump och Jimmie Åkesson
(2023) STVA23 20231Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- This essay examines the discourse strategies used by the political leaders Donald Trump and Jimmie Åkesson in their respective speeches, with a focus on their representation of immigration as a problem. The study employs Carol Bacchi's “What's the problem represented to be?” approach to analyze the rhetoric in Donald Trump's acceptance speech in 2016 and Jimmie Åkesson's speech from Almedalen 2018 and 2022. Drawing upon securitization theory, framing theory, and discursive psychology, we investigate how these political leaders construct immigration as a problem and shape public perceptions. By utilizing these theoretical frameworks, we uncover the underlying security framings, discursive strategies, and assumptions that characterize their... (More)
- This essay examines the discourse strategies used by the political leaders Donald Trump and Jimmie Åkesson in their respective speeches, with a focus on their representation of immigration as a problem. The study employs Carol Bacchi's “What's the problem represented to be?” approach to analyze the rhetoric in Donald Trump's acceptance speech in 2016 and Jimmie Åkesson's speech from Almedalen 2018 and 2022. Drawing upon securitization theory, framing theory, and discursive psychology, we investigate how these political leaders construct immigration as a problem and shape public perceptions. By utilizing these theoretical frameworks, we uncover the underlying security framings, discursive strategies, and assumptions that characterize their rhetoric and influence their policy proposals. The findings highlight the similarities and differences between Trump and Åkessons approaches to framing immigration as a societal challenge. This analysis contributes to a deeper understanding of how political discourse shapes public opinion and policy debates surrounding immigration. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9115102
- author
- Arcini Lundwall, Annie LU and Nerpin, Stella LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- STVA23 20231
- year
- 2023
- type
- L2 - 2nd term paper (old degree order)
- subject
- keywords
- Donald Trump, Jimmie Åkesson, Speech, diskursanalys, komparativ, WTP
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 9115102
- date added to LUP
- 2023-08-18 16:15:10
- date last changed
- 2023-08-18 16:15:10
@misc{9115102, abstract = {{This essay examines the discourse strategies used by the political leaders Donald Trump and Jimmie Åkesson in their respective speeches, with a focus on their representation of immigration as a problem. The study employs Carol Bacchi's “What's the problem represented to be?” approach to analyze the rhetoric in Donald Trump's acceptance speech in 2016 and Jimmie Åkesson's speech from Almedalen 2018 and 2022. Drawing upon securitization theory, framing theory, and discursive psychology, we investigate how these political leaders construct immigration as a problem and shape public perceptions. By utilizing these theoretical frameworks, we uncover the underlying security framings, discursive strategies, and assumptions that characterize their rhetoric and influence their policy proposals. The findings highlight the similarities and differences between Trump and Åkessons approaches to framing immigration as a societal challenge. This analysis contributes to a deeper understanding of how political discourse shapes public opinion and policy debates surrounding immigration.}}, author = {{Arcini Lundwall, Annie and Nerpin, Stella}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Komparativ diskursanalys av Donald Trump och Jimmie Åkesson}}, year = {{2023}}, }