Säkerhetisering av desinformation?
(2023) STVK04 20231Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- In recent years, disinformation has received a lot of attention, including within the European Union (EU). This paper aims to examine the EU's view on disinformation. The paper uses discourse analysis and the Copenhagen School Securitization Theory to analyze two policy documents about disinformation from the EU published in 2018. By examining and highlighting the use of language, the study aims to map how disinformation as a problem is represented and understood by the EU. The purpose is to map and highlight the discourse the EU maintains around disinformation and to investigate if, and how, the EU is securitizing disinformation.
The study shows that the EU describes information as a threat to the democracy, society and citizens within... (More) - In recent years, disinformation has received a lot of attention, including within the European Union (EU). This paper aims to examine the EU's view on disinformation. The paper uses discourse analysis and the Copenhagen School Securitization Theory to analyze two policy documents about disinformation from the EU published in 2018. By examining and highlighting the use of language, the study aims to map how disinformation as a problem is represented and understood by the EU. The purpose is to map and highlight the discourse the EU maintains around disinformation and to investigate if, and how, the EU is securitizing disinformation.
The study shows that the EU describes information as a threat to the democracy, society and citizens within EU. The discourse is dramatized and disinformation is described as a threat that requires a high priority on the political agenda. EU argues that disinformation must be handled to protect democracy, society and citizens and the measures require cooperation between a variety of actors. The EU's rhetoric has great similarities with the securitization theory's speech-acts, and based on the analysis, it is concluded that the policy documents can be regarded as attempts by the EU to securitize disinformation. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9115540
- author
- Holst, Viola LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- STVK04 20231
- year
- 2023
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- Securitization, the Copenhagen School, disinformation, European Union, discourse analysis
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 9115540
- date added to LUP
- 2023-08-18 16:14:13
- date last changed
- 2023-08-18 16:14:13
@misc{9115540, abstract = {{In recent years, disinformation has received a lot of attention, including within the European Union (EU). This paper aims to examine the EU's view on disinformation. The paper uses discourse analysis and the Copenhagen School Securitization Theory to analyze two policy documents about disinformation from the EU published in 2018. By examining and highlighting the use of language, the study aims to map how disinformation as a problem is represented and understood by the EU. The purpose is to map and highlight the discourse the EU maintains around disinformation and to investigate if, and how, the EU is securitizing disinformation. The study shows that the EU describes information as a threat to the democracy, society and citizens within EU. The discourse is dramatized and disinformation is described as a threat that requires a high priority on the political agenda. EU argues that disinformation must be handled to protect democracy, society and citizens and the measures require cooperation between a variety of actors. The EU's rhetoric has great similarities with the securitization theory's speech-acts, and based on the analysis, it is concluded that the policy documents can be regarded as attempts by the EU to securitize disinformation.}}, author = {{Holst, Viola}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Säkerhetisering av desinformation?}}, year = {{2023}}, }