Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

LIBOR: The end of an error

Jeppsson, Andrea LU (2023) NEKH03 20231
Department of Economics
Abstract
LIBOR has been the dominant benchmark rate in the American market for pricing financial instruments. In 2012, the manipulation of LIBOR rates was uncovered, necessitating a change. SOFR was introduced as an alternative reference rate to replace LIBOR as the standard for pricing financial instruments. SOFR has been introduced as a more robust rate less susceptible to manipulation due to its sole reliance on transaction data, contrasting with LIBOR, which relies on bids from banks regarding the rates at which they can currently fund themselves.

Empirical analyses have been conducted to measure the difference in volatility between LIBOR and SOFR and to compare the rates' responsiveness to market events. This research aims to draw... (More)
LIBOR has been the dominant benchmark rate in the American market for pricing financial instruments. In 2012, the manipulation of LIBOR rates was uncovered, necessitating a change. SOFR was introduced as an alternative reference rate to replace LIBOR as the standard for pricing financial instruments. SOFR has been introduced as a more robust rate less susceptible to manipulation due to its sole reliance on transaction data, contrasting with LIBOR, which relies on bids from banks regarding the rates at which they can currently fund themselves.

Empirical analyses have been conducted to measure the difference in volatility between LIBOR and SOFR and to compare the rates' responsiveness to market events. This research aims to draw conclusions about how these two benchmark rates are perceived by the market. Higher volatility may indicate greater risk for investors but can also signify the extent to which rates respond to current market events. Greater responsiveness can suggest that a rate is measuring a more active market. Tests have been carried out using an F-test for equal variances and event studies to examine how the rates react to macroeconomic factors, such as Federal Reserve rate announcements, inflation estimates, and GDP forecasts.

Through the empirical analysis and a review of previous research, this paper finds that LIBOR exhibits higher volatility in its 3-month rate, while SOFR displays higher volatility in its overnight rate. Furthermore, SOFR demonstrates greater responsiveness to listed market events compared to LIBOR, indicating that it measures a more dynamic market. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Jeppsson, Andrea LU
supervisor
organization
course
NEKH03 20231
year
type
M2 - Bachelor Degree
subject
keywords
Referensränta, LIBOR, SOFR, Volatilitet, Marknadsresponsivitet
language
Swedish
id
9136229
date added to LUP
2024-01-22 15:49:18
date last changed
2024-01-22 15:49:18
@misc{9136229,
  abstract     = {{LIBOR has been the dominant benchmark rate in the American market for pricing financial instruments. In 2012, the manipulation of LIBOR rates was uncovered, necessitating a change. SOFR was introduced as an alternative reference rate to replace LIBOR as the standard for pricing financial instruments. SOFR has been introduced as a more robust rate less susceptible to manipulation due to its sole reliance on transaction data, contrasting with LIBOR, which relies on bids from banks regarding the rates at which they can currently fund themselves.

Empirical analyses have been conducted to measure the difference in volatility between LIBOR and SOFR and to compare the rates' responsiveness to market events. This research aims to draw conclusions about how these two benchmark rates are perceived by the market. Higher volatility may indicate greater risk for investors but can also signify the extent to which rates respond to current market events. Greater responsiveness can suggest that a rate is measuring a more active market. Tests have been carried out using an F-test for equal variances and event studies to examine how the rates react to macroeconomic factors, such as Federal Reserve rate announcements, inflation estimates, and GDP forecasts.

Through the empirical analysis and a review of previous research, this paper finds that LIBOR exhibits higher volatility in its 3-month rate, while SOFR displays higher volatility in its overnight rate. Furthermore, SOFR demonstrates greater responsiveness to listed market events compared to LIBOR, indicating that it measures a more dynamic market.}},
  author       = {{Jeppsson, Andrea}},
  language     = {{swe}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{LIBOR: The end of an error}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}