Hyresundantaget i 3:19 LOU - Hur ser tillämplighetsområdet ut i förhållande till entreprenadarbeten enligt rättslig praxis?
(2023) LAGF03 20232Department of Law
Faculty of Law
- Abstract (Swedish)
- Uppsatsen fokuserar på de tidigare aspekterna av kvalificeringen av kontrakt inom EU-rätten, särskilt beträffande tjänstekontrakt och byggentreprenadkontrakt som tidigare reglerades i separata direktiv. Dessa kvalificeringar var väsentliga för att fastställa vilket specifikt direktiv som skulle tillämpas på ett givet kontrakt. I den svenska praxisen har fokus inte enbart legat på att avgöra om ett kontrakt är ett byggentreprenadkontrakt eller ett tjänstekontrakt, utan även om det kan klassificeras som ett hyreskontrakt. Hyresundantaget har sina begränsningar och kan exempelvis inte tillämpas på kontrakt som är relaterade till byggentreprenad, vare sig enligt direktivets ordalydelse eller enligt LOU. Vidare kan det noteras att även om det... (More)
- Uppsatsen fokuserar på de tidigare aspekterna av kvalificeringen av kontrakt inom EU-rätten, särskilt beträffande tjänstekontrakt och byggentreprenadkontrakt som tidigare reglerades i separata direktiv. Dessa kvalificeringar var väsentliga för att fastställa vilket specifikt direktiv som skulle tillämpas på ett givet kontrakt. I den svenska praxisen har fokus inte enbart legat på att avgöra om ett kontrakt är ett byggentreprenadkontrakt eller ett tjänstekontrakt, utan även om det kan klassificeras som ett hyreskontrakt. Hyresundantaget har sina begränsningar och kan exempelvis inte tillämpas på kontrakt som är relaterade till byggentreprenad, vare sig enligt direktivets ordalydelse eller enligt LOU. Vidare kan det noteras att även om det inte tydligt framgår av det klassiska upphandlingsdirektivet kan hyresundantaget troligen inte tillämpas på ett hyresavtal där hyresdelen utgör en sekundär del i förhållande till övriga tjänsterelaterade aspekter i kontraktet. Uppsatsen understryker också att flera separata avtal som en upphandlande myndighet ingår med en leverantör ibland kan bedömas som en helhet om de är nära sammankopplade eller inte kan tillämpas separat. Detta trots att upphandling av tjänstekontrakt och byggentreprenadkontrakt numera regleras i ett och samma direktiv, vilket ibland kräver fortsatt kvalificering av avtalen. (Less)
- Abstract
- The essay focuses on the previous aspects of the qualification of contracts within EU law, particularly regarding service contracts and construction contracts that were previously regulated in separate directives. These qualifications were crucial to determine which specific directive would apply to a given contract. In Swedish practice, the focus has not only been on determining whether a contract is a construction contract or a service contract but also on whether it can be classified as a lease contract. The lease exemption has its limitations and, for instance, cannot be applied to contracts related to construction, either according to the wording of the directive or according to the Public Procurement Act (LOU). Furthermore, it can be... (More)
- The essay focuses on the previous aspects of the qualification of contracts within EU law, particularly regarding service contracts and construction contracts that were previously regulated in separate directives. These qualifications were crucial to determine which specific directive would apply to a given contract. In Swedish practice, the focus has not only been on determining whether a contract is a construction contract or a service contract but also on whether it can be classified as a lease contract. The lease exemption has its limitations and, for instance, cannot be applied to contracts related to construction, either according to the wording of the directive or according to the Public Procurement Act (LOU). Furthermore, it can be noted that even if it is not explicitly stated in the classic procurement directive, the lease exemption probably cannot be applied to a lease agreement where the leasing part is a secondary component in relation to other servicerelated aspects in the contract. The essay also emphasizes that several separate agreements entered into by a contracting authority with a supplier can sometimes be assessed as a whole if they are closely interconnected or cannot be applied separately. This is despite the fact that the procurement of service contracts and construction contracts is now regulated in the same directive, which sometimes requires continued qualification of the agreements. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9143047
- author
- Gruvberger, Marcus LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- LAGF03 20232
- year
- 2023
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- förvaltningsrätt
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 9143047
- date added to LUP
- 2024-02-02 12:09:00
- date last changed
- 2024-02-02 12:09:00
@misc{9143047, abstract = {{The essay focuses on the previous aspects of the qualification of contracts within EU law, particularly regarding service contracts and construction contracts that were previously regulated in separate directives. These qualifications were crucial to determine which specific directive would apply to a given contract. In Swedish practice, the focus has not only been on determining whether a contract is a construction contract or a service contract but also on whether it can be classified as a lease contract. The lease exemption has its limitations and, for instance, cannot be applied to contracts related to construction, either according to the wording of the directive or according to the Public Procurement Act (LOU). Furthermore, it can be noted that even if it is not explicitly stated in the classic procurement directive, the lease exemption probably cannot be applied to a lease agreement where the leasing part is a secondary component in relation to other servicerelated aspects in the contract. The essay also emphasizes that several separate agreements entered into by a contracting authority with a supplier can sometimes be assessed as a whole if they are closely interconnected or cannot be applied separately. This is despite the fact that the procurement of service contracts and construction contracts is now regulated in the same directive, which sometimes requires continued qualification of the agreements.}}, author = {{Gruvberger, Marcus}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Hyresundantaget i 3:19 LOU - Hur ser tillämplighetsområdet ut i förhållande till entreprenadarbeten enligt rättslig praxis?}}, year = {{2023}}, }