Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Uppsägning på grund av arbetsbrist - En analys utifrån modellen om det normativa fältet

Travaglia Granquist, Linn LU and Grenert, Klara LU (2024) HARH16 20232
Department of Business Law
Abstract (Swedish)
I ett samhälle som ständigt utvecklas, och under en pågående lågkonjunktur, är arbetsbrist ett fenomen som verksamheter behöver kunna hantera. Föreliggande kandidatuppsats utgår från rättsdogmatisk metod för att undersöka hur uppsägning vid arbetsbrist regleras i svensk lagstiftning, främst i LAS, och kollektivavtal. Analysen fokuserar på hur olika delar av svensk lagstiftning och kollektivavtal påverkar dragningskraften hos de normativa grundmönstren, då
mönstrens dragningskraft varierar inom rättsområdet. Vilka grundmönster som får starkast dragningskraft i respektive reglering undersöks därför. Modellen består av tre grundmönster: det marknadsfunktionella mönstret, skydd för etablerad position samt rättvis fördelning.

Slutsatsen är... (More)
I ett samhälle som ständigt utvecklas, och under en pågående lågkonjunktur, är arbetsbrist ett fenomen som verksamheter behöver kunna hantera. Föreliggande kandidatuppsats utgår från rättsdogmatisk metod för att undersöka hur uppsägning vid arbetsbrist regleras i svensk lagstiftning, främst i LAS, och kollektivavtal. Analysen fokuserar på hur olika delar av svensk lagstiftning och kollektivavtal påverkar dragningskraften hos de normativa grundmönstren, då
mönstrens dragningskraft varierar inom rättsområdet. Vilka grundmönster som får starkast dragningskraft i respektive reglering undersöks därför. Modellen består av tre grundmönster: det marknadsfunktionella mönstret, skydd för etablerad position samt rättvis fördelning.

Slutsatsen är att skydd för etablerad position har en starkare dragningskraft utifrån lagstiftning till följd av sist-in-förs-ut-principen. Kollektivavtal påverkar grundmönstren och beroende på hur avtalets regleringar ser ut varierar grundmönstrens dragningskraft i styrka. Det marknadsfunktionella mönstret har en något svagare dragningskraft inom lagstiftningen men får ofta en betydligt starkare dragningskraft i och med kollektivavtalens effekt. Orsaken är att
kollektivavtal möjliggör avvikande regleringar från semidispositiva lagstiftningar, exempelvis i 22 § LAS, vilket kan vara fördelaktigt för verksamhetens effektivitet, marknadsposition och ekonomi. Rättvis fördelning har en svagare dragningskraft inom såväl lag som kollektivavtal. Mönstret har dock en viss dragningskraft när det kommer till åldersprioritering vid turordningens, när arbetstagarna har samma anställningstid. (Less)
Abstract
In a society that is constantly evolving, and during an ongoing recession, redundancy is a phenomenon that organisations need to be able to manage. This bachelor thesis is based on a legal-dogmatic method to investigate how dismissal in the event of redundancy is regulated in Swedish legislation, mainly in LAS, and collective agreements. The analysis focuses on how different parts of Swedish legislation and collective agreements affect the pull of the basic normative patterns, as the pull of the patterns varies within the legal field. Which basic patterns have the strongest pull in each regulation is therefore examined. The model consists of three basic patterns: the market-functional pattern, protection of an established position and fair... (More)
In a society that is constantly evolving, and during an ongoing recession, redundancy is a phenomenon that organisations need to be able to manage. This bachelor thesis is based on a legal-dogmatic method to investigate how dismissal in the event of redundancy is regulated in Swedish legislation, mainly in LAS, and collective agreements. The analysis focuses on how different parts of Swedish legislation and collective agreements affect the pull of the basic normative patterns, as the pull of the patterns varies within the legal field. Which basic patterns have the strongest pull in each regulation is therefore examined. The model consists of three basic patterns: the market-functional pattern, protection of an established position and fair distribution.

The conclusion is that protection of an established position has a stronger pull based on legislation due to the last-in-first-out-principle. Collective agreements affect the basic patterns and, depending on the nature of the agreement's regulations, the strength of the attraction of the basic patterns varies. The market-functional basic pattern has a somewhat weaker pull within the legislation but often gains a much stronger pull through the effect of collective
agreements. The reason is that collective agreements enable deviating regulations from semidispositive legislation, for example in 22 § LAS, which can be favourable for the efficiency, market position and economy of the business. Fair distribution has a weak appeal in both law and collective agreements. It does, however, have some attraction when it comes to the age priority of the seniority list, when workers have the same length of employment. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Travaglia Granquist, Linn LU and Grenert, Klara LU
supervisor
organization
course
HARH16 20232
year
type
M2 - Bachelor Degree
subject
keywords
turordning, uppsägning vid arbetsbrist, 22 § LAS, det normativa fältet, omplacering, arbetsbrist
language
Swedish
id
9144386
date added to LUP
2024-01-17 12:10:53
date last changed
2024-01-17 12:10:53
@misc{9144386,
  abstract     = {{In a society that is constantly evolving, and during an ongoing recession, redundancy is a phenomenon that organisations need to be able to manage. This bachelor thesis is based on a legal-dogmatic method to investigate how dismissal in the event of redundancy is regulated in Swedish legislation, mainly in LAS, and collective agreements. The analysis focuses on how different parts of Swedish legislation and collective agreements affect the pull of the basic normative patterns, as the pull of the patterns varies within the legal field. Which basic patterns have the strongest pull in each regulation is therefore examined. The model consists of three basic patterns: the market-functional pattern, protection of an established position and fair distribution.

The conclusion is that protection of an established position has a stronger pull based on legislation due to the last-in-first-out-principle. Collective agreements affect the basic patterns and, depending on the nature of the agreement's regulations, the strength of the attraction of the basic patterns varies. The market-functional basic pattern has a somewhat weaker pull within the legislation but often gains a much stronger pull through the effect of collective 
agreements. The reason is that collective agreements enable deviating regulations from semidispositive legislation, for example in 22 § LAS, which can be favourable for the efficiency, market position and economy of the business. Fair distribution has a weak appeal in both law and collective agreements. It does, however, have some attraction when it comes to the age priority of the seniority list, when workers have the same length of employment.}},
  author       = {{Travaglia Granquist, Linn and Grenert, Klara}},
  language     = {{swe}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Uppsägning på grund av arbetsbrist - En analys utifrån modellen om det normativa fältet}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}