Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Flood risk assessment using GIS and multi-criteria analysis: a pilot study from Rönne å River basin, Scania, Sweden

Steichen, Florian LU (2024) In Student thesis series INES NGEK01 20241
Dept of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science
Abstract
Following the flooding event in Ringsjön within the Rönne å river basin in January 2024, this catchment area was utilized for a flood risk assessment. The study focused on the precipitation event during August 2023, known as Storm Hans. The flood risk assessment for the Rönne å catchment area was conducted using multi-criteria analysis (MCA) and geographical information systems (GIS). Seven factors impacting flooding were considered in the MCA: slope, elevation, monthly precipitation, land use, soil texture, proximity to water bodies, and drainage density, based on the studies by Noori & Bonakdari (2023), Ali et al. (2023), and Hagos et al. (2022). The factors were ranked according to the weights provided in these three studies, as well as... (More)
Following the flooding event in Ringsjön within the Rönne å river basin in January 2024, this catchment area was utilized for a flood risk assessment. The study focused on the precipitation event during August 2023, known as Storm Hans. The flood risk assessment for the Rönne å catchment area was conducted using multi-criteria analysis (MCA) and geographical information systems (GIS). Seven factors impacting flooding were considered in the MCA: slope, elevation, monthly precipitation, land use, soil texture, proximity to water bodies, and drainage density, based on the studies by Noori & Bonakdari (2023), Ali et al. (2023), and Hagos et al. (2022). The factors were ranked according to the weights provided in these three studies, as well as one analysis assigning equal weights to all factors. The factors were normalized using fuzzy linear equations, resulting in values that ranged from 0 (very low flood risk) to 1 (very high flood risk). These normalized factors were combined using the weighted linear combination (WLC) method to create four distinct flood risk maps, where each map was based on the different weights used in the articles. The reliability of these maps was evaluated by overlaying them with a flood map created by Sweco, which utilized the hydraulic model MIKE 11. Since MIKE 11 is a flood simulation model, the resulting polygon from this analysis was considered to represent a 100% very high flood risk. Consequently, when the different maps from the MCA were overlaid with this polygon, the higher the percentage of the high-risk class in that area, the more reliable the map was assumed to be. The map based on the weights from Hagos et al. (2022) proved to be the most accurate, where 79% of the overlaid area with the MIKE 11 model was classified as high and very high risk. Conversely, the map using weights from Noori & Bonakdari (2023) was the least accurate, where only 29% of high to very high areas were found in the polygon layer produced by Sweco. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Steichen, Florian LU
supervisor
organization
course
NGEK01 20241
year
type
M2 - Bachelor Degree
subject
keywords
GIS, MCA, Rönne å, flood risk assessment, fuzzy membership, WCL, extreme precipitation, climate change
publication/series
Student thesis series INES
report number
649
language
English
id
9163737
date added to LUP
2024-06-14 12:40:53
date last changed
2024-06-14 12:40:53
@misc{9163737,
  abstract     = {{Following the flooding event in Ringsjön within the Rönne å river basin in January 2024, this catchment area was utilized for a flood risk assessment. The study focused on the precipitation event during August 2023, known as Storm Hans. The flood risk assessment for the Rönne å catchment area was conducted using multi-criteria analysis (MCA) and geographical information systems (GIS). Seven factors impacting flooding were considered in the MCA: slope, elevation, monthly precipitation, land use, soil texture, proximity to water bodies, and drainage density, based on the studies by Noori & Bonakdari (2023), Ali et al. (2023), and Hagos et al. (2022). The factors were ranked according to the weights provided in these three studies, as well as one analysis assigning equal weights to all factors. The factors were normalized using fuzzy linear equations, resulting in values that ranged from 0 (very low flood risk) to 1 (very high flood risk). These normalized factors were combined using the weighted linear combination (WLC) method to create four distinct flood risk maps, where each map was based on the different weights used in the articles. The reliability of these maps was evaluated by overlaying them with a flood map created by Sweco, which utilized the hydraulic model MIKE 11. Since MIKE 11 is a flood simulation model, the resulting polygon from this analysis was considered to represent a 100% very high flood risk. Consequently, when the different maps from the MCA were overlaid with this polygon, the higher the percentage of the high-risk class in that area, the more reliable the map was assumed to be. The map based on the weights from Hagos et al. (2022) proved to be the most accurate, where 79% of the overlaid area with the MIKE 11 model was classified as high and very high risk. Conversely, the map using weights from Noori & Bonakdari (2023) was the least accurate, where only 29% of high to very high areas were found in the polygon layer produced by Sweco.}},
  author       = {{Steichen, Florian}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  series       = {{Student thesis series INES}},
  title        = {{Flood risk assessment using GIS and multi-criteria analysis: a pilot study from Rönne å River basin, Scania, Sweden}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}