No Conditionality for Human Rights: An Analysis of Human Rights Prevalence in Morocco’s Bilateral Investment Treaties
(2024) MRSM15 20241Human Rights Studies
- Abstract
- Morocco’s occupation of Western Sahara is being justified by Morocco attracting investments to the Western Sahara territory without the consent of the people of Western Sahara. This comes with numerous human rights violations, to which the investments contribute. The prevalence of human rights and the conditionality for it in investment treaties has been discussed by scholars and proven to be nearly absent, although possibly increasing. This thesis investigates the prevalence of human rights conditionality in Morocco’s bilateral investment treaties (BITs), if there is any at all. The thesis puts these aspects of interests for human rights vs. economic interests and the general lack of human rights conditionality in the context of... (More)
- Morocco’s occupation of Western Sahara is being justified by Morocco attracting investments to the Western Sahara territory without the consent of the people of Western Sahara. This comes with numerous human rights violations, to which the investments contribute. The prevalence of human rights and the conditionality for it in investment treaties has been discussed by scholars and proven to be nearly absent, although possibly increasing. This thesis investigates the prevalence of human rights conditionality in Morocco’s bilateral investment treaties (BITs), if there is any at all. The thesis puts these aspects of interests for human rights vs. economic interests and the general lack of human rights conditionality in the context of occupation and exploitation of Western Sahara. This leads to the argument that the lack of human rights interest regarding business on Western Sahara territory has its roots in postcolonialism and imperialism which is also illustrated by World System Theory. This could be reflected in a potential lack of human rights conditionality in Morocco’s BITs, which makes searching for human rights conditionality in the BITs of analytic relevance. To conduct the investigation, the thesis utilizes a comparative content analysis. Although this thesis finds some inclusion of references to human rights, it does not find Moroccan BITs expressing human rights conditionality. As this interprets into economic interests being prioritized, it mirrors the dynamics of postcolonialism, imperialism and World System Theory. The BITs and the involved State parties are legitimizing Morocco’s behavior and allow Morocco to escape conditionality. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9173784
- author
- Holm, Maja LU
- supervisor
-
- Olof Beckman LU
- organization
- course
- MRSM15 20241
- year
- 2024
- type
- H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
- subject
- keywords
- Bilateral investment treaties (BITs), human rights, conditionality, postcolonialism, imperialism, content analysis, comparative analysis, Morocco, Western Sahara.
- language
- English
- id
- 9173784
- date added to LUP
- 2024-09-17 14:04:16
- date last changed
- 2024-09-17 14:04:16
@misc{9173784, abstract = {{Morocco’s occupation of Western Sahara is being justified by Morocco attracting investments to the Western Sahara territory without the consent of the people of Western Sahara. This comes with numerous human rights violations, to which the investments contribute. The prevalence of human rights and the conditionality for it in investment treaties has been discussed by scholars and proven to be nearly absent, although possibly increasing. This thesis investigates the prevalence of human rights conditionality in Morocco’s bilateral investment treaties (BITs), if there is any at all. The thesis puts these aspects of interests for human rights vs. economic interests and the general lack of human rights conditionality in the context of occupation and exploitation of Western Sahara. This leads to the argument that the lack of human rights interest regarding business on Western Sahara territory has its roots in postcolonialism and imperialism which is also illustrated by World System Theory. This could be reflected in a potential lack of human rights conditionality in Morocco’s BITs, which makes searching for human rights conditionality in the BITs of analytic relevance. To conduct the investigation, the thesis utilizes a comparative content analysis. Although this thesis finds some inclusion of references to human rights, it does not find Moroccan BITs expressing human rights conditionality. As this interprets into economic interests being prioritized, it mirrors the dynamics of postcolonialism, imperialism and World System Theory. The BITs and the involved State parties are legitimizing Morocco’s behavior and allow Morocco to escape conditionality.}}, author = {{Holm, Maja}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{No Conditionality for Human Rights: An Analysis of Human Rights Prevalence in Morocco’s Bilateral Investment Treaties}}, year = {{2024}}, }