Myth-Making, Securitisation & Identity Politics: A Case Study of the United Kingdom and its Security Landscape
(2024) SIMZ11 20241Graduate School
- Abstract
- The following thesis seeks to explore the role of myth-making and securitisation in the United Kingdom’s ontological security and identity formation, as seen in their discourses surrounding security and the normalisation of far-right imaginaries and sentiments. It uses the United Kingdom as a case study in lieu of studying the larger phenomena of how national identity has been framed in security discourses in the wake of 9/11. The scope is limited by focusing mainly on the last 14 years of Tory leadership, with the primary focus on the Sunak era of British politics. The theoretical framework is centred on postcolonial theory, ontological security and securitisation. It also incorporates chosen trauma/chosen glory and myth-making as... (More)
- The following thesis seeks to explore the role of myth-making and securitisation in the United Kingdom’s ontological security and identity formation, as seen in their discourses surrounding security and the normalisation of far-right imaginaries and sentiments. It uses the United Kingdom as a case study in lieu of studying the larger phenomena of how national identity has been framed in security discourses in the wake of 9/11. The scope is limited by focusing mainly on the last 14 years of Tory leadership, with the primary focus on the Sunak era of British politics. The theoretical framework is centred on postcolonial theory, ontological security and securitisation. It also incorporates chosen trauma/chosen glory and myth-making as narratives that help create, stabilise and emphasise social realities and ontological (in)security. I argue that the UK is part of larger phenomena post-9/11, wherein the security landscapes of Western states use chosen trauma and chosen glory to justify and enable securitised and militarised versions of society. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9176076
- author
- Länn, Evelina LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- SIMZ11 20241
- year
- 2024
- type
- H2 - Master's Degree (Two Years)
- subject
- keywords
- United Kingdom, myth-making, coloniality, securitisation, ontological insecurity
- language
- English
- id
- 9176076
- date added to LUP
- 2024-10-04 10:41:50
- date last changed
- 2024-10-04 10:41:50
@misc{9176076, abstract = {{The following thesis seeks to explore the role of myth-making and securitisation in the United Kingdom’s ontological security and identity formation, as seen in their discourses surrounding security and the normalisation of far-right imaginaries and sentiments. It uses the United Kingdom as a case study in lieu of studying the larger phenomena of how national identity has been framed in security discourses in the wake of 9/11. The scope is limited by focusing mainly on the last 14 years of Tory leadership, with the primary focus on the Sunak era of British politics. The theoretical framework is centred on postcolonial theory, ontological security and securitisation. It also incorporates chosen trauma/chosen glory and myth-making as narratives that help create, stabilise and emphasise social realities and ontological (in)security. I argue that the UK is part of larger phenomena post-9/11, wherein the security landscapes of Western states use chosen trauma and chosen glory to justify and enable securitised and militarised versions of society.}}, author = {{Länn, Evelina}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Myth-Making, Securitisation & Identity Politics: A Case Study of the United Kingdom and its Security Landscape}}, year = {{2024}}, }