Legitimitet genom narrativ
(2025) UNDK02 20242Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- This thesis examines Russia’s official justifications for its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, focusing on the construction and dissemination of key narratives within its rhetoric. Through a combined narrative and discourse analysis, the study explores how these narratives, centered on security concerns, ideological threats, and humanitarian arguments, serve to legitimize the use of force. Key narratives include claims of NATO expansionism threatening Russia’s sovereignty, allegations of genocide against Russian-speaking populations in Donbas, and the call for Ukraine’s ‘denazification’. The research highlights the strategic use of historical analogies, defensive framing, and tailored messaging to resonate with various audiences, from... (More)
- This thesis examines Russia’s official justifications for its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, focusing on the construction and dissemination of key narratives within its rhetoric. Through a combined narrative and discourse analysis, the study explores how these narratives, centered on security concerns, ideological threats, and humanitarian arguments, serve to legitimize the use of force. Key narratives include claims of NATO expansionism threatening Russia’s sovereignty, allegations of genocide against Russian-speaking populations in Donbas, and the call for Ukraine’s ‘denazification’. The research highlights the strategic use of historical analogies, defensive framing, and tailored messaging to resonate with various audiences, from domestic constituencies to international allies and skeptics. It also examines how these narratives interact with broader geopolitical discourses, aiming to position Russia as a morally responsible actor counterbalancing Western expansionism. By unpacking the rhetorical strategies employed, this thesis provides insights into the mechanisms of state-led legitimation campaigns and their implications for international security and information warfare. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9180865
- author
- Petersson, Lisa LU
- supervisor
- organization
- alternative title
- Rysslands retoriska strategi bakom invasionen av Ukraina
- course
- UNDK02 20242
- year
- 2025
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- Russian invasion of Ukraine, justification narratives, denazification and genocide discourse, Western hegemony, legitimacy
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 9180865
- date added to LUP
- 2025-02-17 11:02:11
- date last changed
- 2025-02-17 11:02:11
@misc{9180865, abstract = {{This thesis examines Russia’s official justifications for its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, focusing on the construction and dissemination of key narratives within its rhetoric. Through a combined narrative and discourse analysis, the study explores how these narratives, centered on security concerns, ideological threats, and humanitarian arguments, serve to legitimize the use of force. Key narratives include claims of NATO expansionism threatening Russia’s sovereignty, allegations of genocide against Russian-speaking populations in Donbas, and the call for Ukraine’s ‘denazification’. The research highlights the strategic use of historical analogies, defensive framing, and tailored messaging to resonate with various audiences, from domestic constituencies to international allies and skeptics. It also examines how these narratives interact with broader geopolitical discourses, aiming to position Russia as a morally responsible actor counterbalancing Western expansionism. By unpacking the rhetorical strategies employed, this thesis provides insights into the mechanisms of state-led legitimation campaigns and their implications for international security and information warfare.}}, author = {{Petersson, Lisa}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Legitimitet genom narrativ}}, year = {{2025}}, }