Skip to main content

LUP Student Papers

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Psykologers perspektiv på evidensbaserad psykologisk praktik - En kvalitativ intervjustudie.

Sparre, Kristina LU and Lind, Mark LU (2025) PSPR14 20242
Department of Psychology
Abstract (Swedish)
Evidensbaserad psykologisk praktik (EBPP) kombinerar forskning, klinisk
erfarenhet och patientfaktorer för att främja effektiv psykologisk behandling.
Studien undersöker legitimerade psykologers erfarenheter av att arbeta med
EBPP inom barn- och ungdomspsykiatrin (BUP) genom kvalitativa intervjuer.
Den belyser psykologernas uppfattningar om EBPP:s tillämpning, dess
möjligheter och begränsningar. Tre huvudsakliga teman framkom: (1) Vikten av
upplevd professionell autonomi för att kunna arbeta enligt EBPP, där psykologer
beskrev vikten av frihet att anpassa behandlingar men också utmaningar med att
balansera detta mot organisatoriska krav; (2) Vad händer med EBPP på BUP?
där psykologerna belyser hur tids- och resursbrist samt... (More)
Evidensbaserad psykologisk praktik (EBPP) kombinerar forskning, klinisk
erfarenhet och patientfaktorer för att främja effektiv psykologisk behandling.
Studien undersöker legitimerade psykologers erfarenheter av att arbeta med
EBPP inom barn- och ungdomspsykiatrin (BUP) genom kvalitativa intervjuer.
Den belyser psykologernas uppfattningar om EBPP:s tillämpning, dess
möjligheter och begränsningar. Tre huvudsakliga teman framkom: (1) Vikten av
upplevd professionell autonomi för att kunna arbeta enligt EBPP, där psykologer
beskrev vikten av frihet att anpassa behandlingar men också utmaningar med att
balansera detta mot organisatoriska krav; (2) Vad händer med EBPP på BUP?
där psykologerna belyser hur tids- och resursbrist samt organisatoriska riktlinjer
skapar begränsningar, vilket leder till en inre konflikt när psykologerna upplever
att de inte fullt ut kan möta patienternas behov; och (3) Psykologen och
personen, där psykologerna reflekterade över hur deras yrkeskompetens och
personliga erfarenheter påverkar deras arbete. Resultaten indikerar att
psykologerna överlag ser positivt på EBPP men att de ofta upplever konflikter
mellan riktlinjer och patienternas individuella behov. Tydliga riktlinjer ansågs
bidra till enhetlig vård men kunde även begränsa psykologernas kliniska
handlingsutrymme. Studien pekar på behovet av att undersöka användningen av
EBPP och implementering av riktlinjer ur ett kvalitativt perspektiv. (Less)
Abstract
Evidence-based practice in psychology (EBPP) combines research, clinical experience, and patient factors to promote effective psychological treatments. The present study examines licensed psychologists' experiences of working with EBPP in child and adolescent psychiatry (BUP) in Sweden through qualitative interviews. It highlights psychologists' perceptions of EBPP's applications, its possibilities and limitations. Three main themes emerged: (1) The importance of perceived professional autonomy to be able to work according to EBPP, where psychologists described the importance of freedom to adapt treatments but also challenges in balancing this freedom against organizational demands; (2) What happens to EBPP at BUP? where the psychologists... (More)
Evidence-based practice in psychology (EBPP) combines research, clinical experience, and patient factors to promote effective psychological treatments. The present study examines licensed psychologists' experiences of working with EBPP in child and adolescent psychiatry (BUP) in Sweden through qualitative interviews. It highlights psychologists' perceptions of EBPP's applications, its possibilities and limitations. Three main themes emerged: (1) The importance of perceived professional autonomy to be able to work according to EBPP, where psychologists described the importance of freedom to adapt treatments but also challenges in balancing this freedom against organizational demands; (2) What happens to EBPP at BUP? where the psychologists highlight how lack of time and resources as well as organizational guidelines create limitations, which leads to an internal conflict when the psychologists feel that they cannot fully meet the patients' needs; and (3) The psychologist and the person, where the psychologists reflected on how their professional competence and personal experiences influence their work. The results indicate that psychologists generally view EBPP positively, but that they often experience conflicts between guidelines and patients' individual needs. The study points to the need to examine the use of EBPP and implementation of guidelines from a qualitative perspective. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
Sparre, Kristina LU and Lind, Mark LU
supervisor
organization
course
PSPR14 20242
year
type
H3 - Professional qualifications (4 Years - )
subject
keywords
professional autonomy, child and adolescent psychiatry, implementation, ambivalence, guidelines, professionell autonomi, barn- och ungdomspsykiatri, implementering, ambivalens, riktlinjer
language
Swedish
id
9181548
date added to LUP
2025-01-29 08:58:02
date last changed
2025-01-29 08:58:02
@misc{9181548,
  abstract     = {{Evidence-based practice in psychology (EBPP) combines research, clinical experience, and patient factors to promote effective psychological treatments. The present study examines licensed psychologists' experiences of working with EBPP in child and adolescent psychiatry (BUP) in Sweden through qualitative interviews. It highlights psychologists' perceptions of EBPP's applications, its possibilities and limitations. Three main themes emerged: (1) The importance of perceived professional autonomy to be able to work according to EBPP, where psychologists described the importance of freedom to adapt treatments but also challenges in balancing this freedom against organizational demands; (2) What happens to EBPP at BUP? where the psychologists highlight how lack of time and resources as well as organizational guidelines create limitations, which leads to an internal conflict when the psychologists feel that they cannot fully meet the patients' needs; and (3) The psychologist and the person, where the psychologists reflected on how their professional competence and personal experiences influence their work. The results indicate that psychologists generally view EBPP positively, but that they often experience conflicts between guidelines and patients' individual needs. The study points to the need to examine the use of EBPP and implementation of guidelines from a qualitative perspective.}},
  author       = {{Sparre, Kristina and Lind, Mark}},
  language     = {{swe}},
  note         = {{Student Paper}},
  title        = {{Psykologers perspektiv på evidensbaserad psykologisk praktik - En kvalitativ intervjustudie.}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}