Vapen för fred? Sveriges vapenexport till auktoritära stater och självbilden som humanitär stormakt
(2025) STVK04 20251Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- The Swedish arms export legislation was tightened in 2018, with a particular focus on imposing stricter requirements on recipient countries to demonstrate respect for human rights and democracy. Despite this, annual reports from the Swedish Inspectorate of Strategic Products (ISP) show that Sweden continues to export military equipment to countries that do not meet the new legal standards. While arms exports to undemocratic states that violate human rights persist, Sweden maintains a self-image as a humanitarian superpower. How do Swedish state actors justify this, and how does it align with that self-perception? This study applies two theoretical frameworks: Johan Matz’s theory of three traditions in arms export policy, and a theory on... (More)
- The Swedish arms export legislation was tightened in 2018, with a particular focus on imposing stricter requirements on recipient countries to demonstrate respect for human rights and democracy. Despite this, annual reports from the Swedish Inspectorate of Strategic Products (ISP) show that Sweden continues to export military equipment to countries that do not meet the new legal standards. While arms exports to undemocratic states that violate human rights persist, Sweden maintains a self-image as a humanitarian superpower. How do Swedish state actors justify this, and how does it align with that self-perception? This study applies two theoretical frameworks: Johan Matz’s theory of three traditions in arms export policy, and a theory on legitimation and delegitimation. Through a qualitative analysis of
ideas, the study examines the arguments presented in public documents. The conclusion is that state actors often justify arms exports to authoritarian regimes by emphasizing economic interests, security concerns, and the legal exemption for follow-on deliveries. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9189679
- author
- Roble, Madina LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- STVK04 20251
- year
- 2025
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- Vapenexport, humanitär stormakt, legitimering, följdleveranser, försvarsindustri, Sverige
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 9189679
- date added to LUP
- 2025-08-08 11:09:02
- date last changed
- 2025-08-08 11:09:02
@misc{9189679, abstract = {{The Swedish arms export legislation was tightened in 2018, with a particular focus on imposing stricter requirements on recipient countries to demonstrate respect for human rights and democracy. Despite this, annual reports from the Swedish Inspectorate of Strategic Products (ISP) show that Sweden continues to export military equipment to countries that do not meet the new legal standards. While arms exports to undemocratic states that violate human rights persist, Sweden maintains a self-image as a humanitarian superpower. How do Swedish state actors justify this, and how does it align with that self-perception? This study applies two theoretical frameworks: Johan Matz’s theory of three traditions in arms export policy, and a theory on legitimation and delegitimation. Through a qualitative analysis of ideas, the study examines the arguments presented in public documents. The conclusion is that state actors often justify arms exports to authoritarian regimes by emphasizing economic interests, security concerns, and the legal exemption for follow-on deliveries.}}, author = {{Roble, Madina}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{Vapen för fred? Sveriges vapenexport till auktoritära stater och självbilden som humanitär stormakt}}, year = {{2025}}, }