När världen ser på- vem vågar prata om sexuellt våld i väpnade konflikter? En kvantitativ undersökning om staters fördömande av konfliktrelaterat sexuellt våld
(2025) STVK04 20251Department of Political Science
- Abstract
- Why do some states shame norm-violating states when others remain silent? Inter-state “naming and shaming” is typically viewed as a political tool and a calculated act to shame rivals and highlight allies. In this study I investigate why countries shame conflict related sexual violence in the Universal Periodic Review, based on domestic factors. This study explicitly seeks to answer the following question: how does equality and female representation effect countries propensity to condemn conflict related sexual violence in the UN´s Univeral Periodic Review? The analysis is limited to African countries from 2019. The study is based on a feminist international relations perspective whereas equality is viewed as a normative structure with... (More)
- Why do some states shame norm-violating states when others remain silent? Inter-state “naming and shaming” is typically viewed as a political tool and a calculated act to shame rivals and highlight allies. In this study I investigate why countries shame conflict related sexual violence in the Universal Periodic Review, based on domestic factors. This study explicitly seeks to answer the following question: how does equality and female representation effect countries propensity to condemn conflict related sexual violence in the UN´s Univeral Periodic Review? The analysis is limited to African countries from 2019. The study is based on a feminist international relations perspective whereas equality is viewed as a normative structure with capacity to form states foreign policy actions. To calculate the result, a multiple linear regression analysis was used. The result shows that only gender equality has a significant effect on a country's propensity to condemn conflict related violence. On the other hand, women's representation did not have a significant effect on the dependent variable. The findings have implications for how we understand state interactions in international politics and how Africa acts as a global normactor. Furthermore the study contributes with knowledge about how feminist perspectives can explain mechanisms behind states normative behaviour in multilateral relations. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9189879
- author
- Mejare Berntsson, Tova LU
- supervisor
- organization
- course
- STVK04 20251
- year
- 2025
- type
- M2 - Bachelor Degree
- subject
- keywords
- Konfliktrelaterat sexuellt våld, Förenta Nationerna, Universal Periodic Review, Mänskliga rättigheter, Naming and shaming
- language
- Swedish
- id
- 9189879
- date added to LUP
- 2025-08-08 11:08:36
- date last changed
- 2025-08-08 11:08:36
@misc{9189879, abstract = {{Why do some states shame norm-violating states when others remain silent? Inter-state “naming and shaming” is typically viewed as a political tool and a calculated act to shame rivals and highlight allies. In this study I investigate why countries shame conflict related sexual violence in the Universal Periodic Review, based on domestic factors. This study explicitly seeks to answer the following question: how does equality and female representation effect countries propensity to condemn conflict related sexual violence in the UN´s Univeral Periodic Review? The analysis is limited to African countries from 2019. The study is based on a feminist international relations perspective whereas equality is viewed as a normative structure with capacity to form states foreign policy actions. To calculate the result, a multiple linear regression analysis was used. The result shows that only gender equality has a significant effect on a country's propensity to condemn conflict related violence. On the other hand, women's representation did not have a significant effect on the dependent variable. The findings have implications for how we understand state interactions in international politics and how Africa acts as a global normactor. Furthermore the study contributes with knowledge about how feminist perspectives can explain mechanisms behind states normative behaviour in multilateral relations.}}, author = {{Mejare Berntsson, Tova}}, language = {{swe}}, note = {{Student Paper}}, title = {{När världen ser på- vem vågar prata om sexuellt våld i väpnade konflikter? En kvantitativ undersökning om staters fördömande av konfliktrelaterat sexuellt våld}}, year = {{2025}}, }